ru en
The New World Order
Admin (23/05/2012 @ 10:43)
: The New World Order
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 15/06/2012 @ 08:58
Time for a Middle East Peace Plan
                                                
                                             
15.06.2012

For over half a century, we have watched as the leaders of the world community have struggled, impotently, to create a peaceful solution to the Middle East question, a region which lies at the heart of the world, geographically, spiritually and culturally, a region which symbolically represents the hopes and dreams of Humankind.

And what do we see? Downward spirals of violence, acts of brutality, torture, stealing of property, terrorism, mutilation, murder, rape, desecration of cemeteries, separation walls, illegal settlements, hatred. In fact, not a bad mirror image of what Humankind has become, in a world where international law exists only on paper and serves as a basis to be manipulated and broken, in a world in which powerful nations wantonly arm and support terrorists and manipulate them into power in strategic regions. We have evolved little since the time of the apes.

This may be what we have become; it is not necessarily where we wish to be and is certainly a statement which will be examined by our peers in the future, who will judge us on our capacity to find solutions to problems. It is perfectly clear that all those engaged in the process for the last sixty-four years since Israel was formed in 1948, along with all the approaches attempted, have failed for numerous reasons.

We are not speaking only about Israel and the Palestinians; we are speaking about an escalation of violence across the entire region, spreading throughout Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Myanmar. The common denominator is not Moslems, it is a lack of respect, it is intrusion by foreign powers which have proven utterly incapable of concentrating on their own problems within their own borders.

Bosnians, Croats, Serbs, Albanians, Catholics, Orthodox Christians and Moslems got along for centuries in the Balkans before foreign powers started meddling. They married each other, they had families and they rejoiced in their cultural diversity; across the entire Middle East, Sunni and Shia, Sufis, Wahabis, Salafists, Khilafites, Deobandis, Ashariyah, Alawi, Qadiani, Ahmedi, Druze, Dawoodi and Bohra lived side by side just as Orthodox Christians, or Roman Catholics or Presbyterians, Lutherans, Calvinists, Anglicans and so on live side by side elsewhere.

The common denominator in all these cases is respect for human life, this being the mainstay of all religions, which are codes of behaviour in subservience to the respective God. So, if the common denominator binding these people together is peace and respect and the common denominator behind the problems is intrusion and the fomenting of sectarian violence, we can see that it does not take much to turn a peace-loving, law-abiding, God-fearing individual into a marauding monster. All you have to do is give an adolescent male a machine-gun and sooner or later he is going to point it at someone. After the first, it's just another kill.

Downloading, in a top-down approach, an entire State into a region inhabited by others was perhaps the most risky venture of the United Nations Organization, one bound to create problems, and as Israel was implanted at the cost of expelling Palestinians from their homes and farms, it was not unnatural that the process would be met with resistance. The State of Israel, however, exists and has been recognised by international law, such as that exists.

The resulting situation is the need to find the best of a number of bad solutions, yet a solution it would be.

If we accept that what is written above is true, then it makes sense to focus on the common goodness in Humankind, whatever their religion, whatever the more complex economic, historical, cultural and developmental vectors make individuals so unique and it does not make sense for vested interests to fan the flames of sectarian violence.

What is required is an international forum with some power, and it is by now obvious that the United Nations Organization is an excellent humanitarian umbrella but useless as a forum of law-making and implementation because it has been corrupted and insulted by certain of its founding members. There are two options: admit it has failed in this respect and form a new international legal forum which has clout and consequences for those who breach its terms, or reform it to give it a new lease of life.

The new organism has then a very clear policy to follow: invite all the parties engaged in a lasting peace plan to a round table in which the broader issues form policy and the details are left until last, after Statehood has been achieved. With Statehood comes responsibility and with responsibility comes respect for the law.

The law is very clear here: Israel's borders and those of the Palestinian Authority are those set up and agreed upon multilaterally in 1948. The right of abode within each of these areas is an issue to be discussed between both parties. It would appear that areas annexed and urbanised by Israel should be returned immediately or else should incur a rent over a fixed period of time during phase-out and such money could help to set up the Palestinian Institutions. Nobody asked the Israelis to seize land that is not theirs.

Israel's Constitution includes clauses calling for and granting the right of abode to Jews from around the world, so there is no argument that there is no space for the colonists. As for compensating the Palestinians whose properties were seized in 1948, then that is covered under the UN Resolution of the time and it should be the UNO that finances this   in other words, the world community. It is like buying a peace covenant.

Surely, this process could be pursued after Statehood is agreed upon and once this has been determined, the rest is a question of details, since there is no turning back. After this, there is one final question to be solved, and that is establishing Jerusalem as a beacon of hope for Humankind - an international city, home to the new or re-empowered UNO, a city belonging to everyone and nobody at the same time.

               
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 15/06/2012 @ 09:20
U.S. Exploits Syrian Situation For Showdown With Russia


June 14, 2012


By Rick Rozoff

On June 12 what passes for the U.S.s top diplomat, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, further escalated tensions with Russia in an appearance with Israeli President Shimon Peres at the Brookings Institution, a think tank that has supplied the Barack Obama administration with many of its key foreign policy personnel.

With an Israeli flag behind her and waving her right hand in the air, she vociferated:

We have confronted the Russians about stopping their continued arms shipments to Syria. They have, from time to time, said that we shouldnt worry everything they are shipping is unrelated to their (the Syrian governments) actions internally. Thats patently untrue.

And we are concerned about the latest information we have that there are attack helicopters on the way from Russia to Syria, which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically.

Russian officials promptly denounced the charge as the crude fabrication and cruder provocation it was, with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov remonstrating:

We are not delivering to Syria, or anywhere else, items that could be used against peaceful demonstrators. In this we differ from the United States, which regularly delivers riot control equipment to the region, including a recent delivery to a Persian Gulf country. But for some reason the Americans consider this to be fine.

Clinton has been steadily raising the level of anti-Russian invective, vilification and intimidation in recent months.

Last December she denounced the countrys parliamentary elections of that month as being neither free nor fair, stating:

Russian voters deserve a full investigation of all credible reports of electoral fraud and manipulation, and we hope in particular that the Russian authorities will take action.

In February she commented on the double veto by Russia and China in the United Nations Security Council over Syria in the following choice American-style diplomatese at a so-called Friends of Syria conference in Tunisia:

Its quite distressing to see two permanent members of the Security Council using their veto while people are being murdered women, children, brave young men houses are being destroyed.

It is just despicable and I ask whose side are they on? They are clearly not on the side of the Syrian people.

Her characterization of Russias and Chinas second joint veto over attempted moves against the Syrian government by the U.S., its NATO allies and their coalition of Arab monarchy partners (Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco. Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) as despicable echoed that of U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice earlier in that month:

The fact that Russia and China chose to align themselves with a dictator who is on his last legs rather than the people of Syria, rather than the people of the Middle East, rather than the principled views of the rest of the international community, was indeed disgusting and shameful and I think that over time it is a decision theyll come to regret when there is a democratic Syria that wont forget this action.

Despicable, disgusting and shameful are typical entries in the lexicon employed by the international relations corps of the worlds sole military superpower. (The term embraced by President Obama in his 2009 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech.) And indicative of the level of its diplomacy and its attitude toward other, even major, nations.

In the same address in Tunisia in February, Clinton bluntly called for a military coup detat in Damascus in these words:

To those Syrians who still support Assad, especially members of the Syrian military: understand that this regime has no future. The longer you carry out its campaign of violence, the more it will stain your honor. But if you refuse to take part in attacks on your fellow citizens, your countrymen will hail you as heroes.

Before she steps down as secretary of state Clinton may well establish a record for demanding foreign heads of state abdicate power or face the fate of those who dont do so at the snap of her fingers adding Syrias Bashar Assad to Ivory Coasts President Laurent Gbagbo, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and, practically speaking, Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko last year.   

There are fewer and fewer governments in the world unwilling to do Washingtons bidding as votes in the United Nations Security Council and Human Rights Council on Syria this year demonstrate. In fact Russia, China, Iran, Belarus, North Korea, Zimbabwe, Eritrea, members of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela and at times Sudan are all that remain of nations with an independent foreign policy orientation.

Among that shrinking list Russia alone has rough strategic nuclear parity with the U.S. and as such is the true last barrier to the U.S. drive for global domination.

The Syrian crisis has dragged on for over fifteen months and has been exploited by the U.S. and its particularly NATO allies to isolate, humiliate and confront Russia in the first case and China in the second. Having to various degrees backed Russia down over Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya in recent years, Washington is now mounting a full frontal attack designed to effect not a retreat but a rout.

To believe for a moment that the military superpower that in recent years has laid waste to the former Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and is conducting lawless and murderous drone missile attacks in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia is in any manner motivated by alleged humanitarian concerns in Syria is either to engage in deliriously wishful thinking or surrender to outright delusion.

On June 9 Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov provided a reality test for, an information antidote to the Western human rights argument:

[I]n order to justify a foreign intervention they keep talking about the refugees from Syria. However, nobody talks about refugees inside Syria itself.

This is similar to the former Yugoslavia. Does anybody think about the refugees from Serbia and Slovenia? [He may have intended Croatia with the latter reference.]

According to some estimates, there are about a million refugees from Iraq and half a million Palestinians in Syria, and I dont think people talk much about that.

While in Beijing for the twelfth annual heads of state summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) at the beginning of the month, the Russian foreign minister emphasized an effective substitute to the Wests past 21 years of rampant military aggression, threats, bullying and arrogance in stating that there is no alternative to the enlargement of the SCO, an interest in which is growing steadily inside and outside of the region.   

The six members of the SCO are Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. At the latest summit Afghanistan joined India, Iran, Mongolia and Pakistan as an observer nation, Turkey joined Belarus and Sri Lanka as a dialogue partner and the president of Turkmenistan delivered a speech. Collectively, the above nations account for well over half the worlds population, three members of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and four nuclear powers and are the nucleus of a genuine new 21st century international political and economic approach and structure.

Unless a peaceful, cooperative and multipolar model based on the above and its underlying philosophy emerges soon, the ineluctable destiny the world faces is that Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev warned of on May 17:

The introduction of all sorts of collective sanctions bypassing international institutions does not improve the situation in the world while reckless military operations in foreign states usually end up with radicals coming to power.

At some point such actions, which undermine state sovereignty, may well end in a full-blown regional war and even Im not trying to spook anyone the use of nuclear weapons.

In intensifying its progressively more dangerous confrontation with the worlds other major nuclear power by threatening it over Syria and expelling it from the Arab world and the Mediterranean while surrounding it with NATO partnerships and a global interceptor missile system, Washington is pushing the world closer to just such a the ultimate nightmare scenario.

A wounded beast is often the most vicious and a dying empire doesnt hesitate to destroy a world it cannot dominate.

Rick Rozoff, Stop NATO
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 19/06/2012 @ 09:37
Hezbollah leader doubts Israeli threats
                                                
                                             
18.06.2012


up_immagini/sana052.jpg

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad.

Israeli threats against Iran are merely "psychological warfare" - The Secretary General of Hezbollah, the Islamic Resistance Movement in Lebanon, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, said Friday that threats by the Israeli regime to carry out a military strike against the Islamic Republic of Iran are just psychological warfare.

"Today, the Zionist regime is weaker than at any time, and its threats to attack Iran are simply a psychological war," said Nasrallah, in an interview with Iranian TV channel Al-Alam Arabic News.

The United States and some of its allies, along with the regime in Israel, accuse Iran of using its nuclear energy program for military purposes, and urge Tehran to fully suspend its nuclear program.

In an attempt to force Iran to suspend its nuclear program for peaceful purposes, the Israeli regime, which has an estimated 200 to 400 nuclear warheads, has repeatedly threatened the Persian country with a military option.

Meanwhile, Iran denies the charges, arguing that as a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and committed signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), they have the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful, civilian purposes.

The IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities, but has never found any evidence to confirm western allegations that Iran's nuclear program could be used for military purposes.

The regime in Tel Aviv is the only one in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapons and has never allowed IAEA inspectors to review its nuclear facilities and has always avoided signing the NPT.

Hezbollah is quite familiar with Israeli capabilities due to their recent successful campaign to turn back Israel's incursion into Lebanon in 2006.   It began with the idiocy of claiming that invading Israelis had been "abducted" by Hezbollah, rather than having been taken prisoners of war.   How you can be accused of "abducting" ot "kidnapping" a uniformed invader is beyond me.

Essentially, Hezbollah turned invading Merkava tanks into flaming junk piles and Israeli soldiers into the crying, weeping cowards they were.   The big, bad IDF doesn't like fighting those who can fight back.

Despite claims of having weakened Hezbollah's ability to defend Lebanon, the opposite was true.   Only able to destroy less than 7% of Hezbollah military assets, frustrated by their inability to identify and destroy major Hezbollah military assets, the IAF targeted infrastructure, schools, homes, community centers and mosques.

Today Hezbollah has never been stronger or more able to defend Lebanon.

Translated from the Spanish version and appended by:

Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 25/06/2012 @ 09:02
The Russian military cargoes are delivered by the ships under the Russian flags accompanied by the Russian Navies. The Russian ships under foreign flags without protection of the Navy deliver commercial cargoes not connected with the Russian state cargoes.
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 27/06/2012 @ 16:29
The Post-U.S. Era


26 June 2012


by Imad Fawzi Shueibi


At the end of the 20th century, the good news was the demise of the USSR as an empire imposing its law on Central Europe, while the bad news was the survival of the U.S. as an empire imposing its law on Western Europe, Latin America and other parts of the world. The rebirth of Russia and the rise of China lead inexorably to the crafting of a New International Order, from which the anachronistic U.S. Empire will disappear. Hence, strategists are pondering ways to limit the upheavals that are inherent to transition periods. For Dr. Imad Shuebi, the new leaders of the world, Beijing and Moscow, are acting with caution to prevent a world war, but anticipate bloody regional conflicts.

Talking about the Post-American Era is no longer considered to be political garrulous rant and wishful thinking. When I wrote about this idea in my book New Political World Order in 1991, it was a kind of prospective analysis that could not be taken seriously then. Non-believing hinged on motives known in epistemology as the obstacle of common knowledge and change resistance.

At that time, my thinking constituted an epistemological break, that would later coined by Nassim Nicholas Taleb as the "black swan theory" or "lateral thinking" (1), or what came to be known as Thinking Outside the Box. I used to warn and still do that Great Powers do not die in bed. What dangerously represents the demise of those countries is their possession of both nuclear weapons and great historical and strategic memories. These are never absent. They are there at the back of the minds and in the recent memories.

Chinese and Russian officials did not keep it a secret nor was it a mere burst of candor -contrary to what Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote- when they concluded that the decline of the U.S. and the rise of China and Russia were an inevitability, (2). However, breaking down is not an option for great powers. They may fail, but not collapse. In reality such powers can only be shelved.

Chinese and American officials recommend that a great power should not decline too quickly. Though Zbigniew Brzezinski agrees on the aforementioned, he thinks the world is unlikely to be dominated by a single successor not even China; something on which we agree temporarily, just as we agree on the fact that the phase of global disorder and international uncertainty deteriorated in 2011 to such a degree that it has set off alarm bells of overwhelming chaos. Americans as well Russians and Chinese dread such a warning; however, for some adventurous countries like France and a few others in the Middle East, the prospect of losing their status as regional powers raises the fear of an increased risk of destabilization. The major powers dread the chaos whereas the lesser ones sometimes bet on it so as to disrupt the former in the hope of seeing them recoil from the international scene with minimal losses.

The shift towards a new world order accelerated conspicuously in 2011-2012 considering that only a very short time gap separated Putins announcement of the breakdown of unipolarity -while making it clear that the emerging powers were not ready to take over yet- from his later announcement at the BRICS Conference of the formation of a New Economic-Banking System (The BRICS Bank) (3). Not only did the increasingly sharp tone of Russia and China lead to the two double-vetoes, but it also enabled them to assume the leading role in the unfolding dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean, which undoubtedly meant that U.S. history in the region had already faded away and that no other party could stake any claim for the time being.

Obamas announcement (in early 2012) of the New American Strategy, which entailed "being alert and cautious in the Eastern Mediterranean," sounded as an acknowledgement of the shift in the balance of power at the same time as the U.S. was militarizing Chinas vicinity. In addition, Hilary Clintons declaration from Australia was perceived as an extension of the confrontational rhetoric aimed at China, who simply responded by saying: No one can stop the Chinese sun from rising.

Because of such declarations, China did not wait for 2016 in order to display its new stength. On the contrary, she hastened to advocate for a multipolar order, in line with the terms laid out by Russia, and which we define as an International Order consisting of two axes with multiple poles orbiting around each one. However, one axis is ascending while the other one is descending.

It has become clear that the worsening of the conflict has deeply shaken U.S. diplomacy, which was forced, in April 2012, to sound the retreat albeit only verbally- from confrontation and to state that the U.S. was not engaged in a cold war with China. That came after a meeting between the Chinese Prime Minister and Kofi Annan, during which the latter was informed that China and Russia are now the leading world powers, ranking respectively first and second, and that he, Kofi Annan, had to coordinate with them. As a front-row witness to the unipolar world stretching from 1991 to the early 21st century, Annan would now have to witness the downfall of that same world, having to accept that Moscow and Beijing are henceforth in charge of issues relating to the Eastern Mediterranean.

Washington has been mired in war for a whole decade a period reminiscent of the arms race with the USSR, known as "Star Wars,"- which, together with other crises, has drained the United States and turned it into a state on the brink of bankruptcy. That prompted Washington to announce a re-positioning on Chinas periphery in an attempt to play a role in the Indo-Pacific region. But, it backtracked on that announcement in such as way as to suggest that it has actually already lost its superpower aura. In fact, when a major country threatens to employ a force that only superpowers are endowed with, it loses two thirds of that force.

The world is changing. We are witnessing precisely the New International Order whose crystallization had been postponed since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but has accelerated towards maturity even though some of its emerging powers may not yet be quite ready. The precipitation of events in the Middle East obliged those new players to rapidly join the game. However, the consequences of the emergence of new powers and the decline of those who, like the United States, formerly occupied a leading position will soon manifest themselves and have an effect on regional powers. Those consequences will translate into bloody struggles that may not find a solution until after the New World Order has been established, with the consent of the multiple actors and in accordance with their new status.

Imad Fawzi Shueibi

[1] According to the Lebanese-US epistemologist Nassim Nicholas Taleb, "A black swan is a highly improbable event with 3 main features: It is unpredictable, produces major consequences and a post facto explanation is always provided to render it more rational, giving it an apparent and reassuring predictability." See "The Black Swan, The power of the unpredictable," Oxford University Press, 2008.

[2] "After America - How does the world look in an age of U.S. decline?," by Zbigniew Brzezinsk, Foreign Policy, January/February 2012.

[3] "Delhi Declaration (Fourth BRICS Summit), Voltaire Network, 29 March 2012

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 30/06/2012 @ 19:30


It is necessary to be the real German fascists, or successors of executioners from Gestapo what not to start up Vitaly Kaloyev who has lost all his family on fault by Swiss and German air-dispatchers, to mourning's actions.

In July, 2002 Russian passenger liner Tu-154 collided with a transport Boeing-747 on   the German - Switzerland border over the Boden Lake (Bodensee). 71 people, including 52   children were killed. The tragedy occurred because of the Swiss air dispatcher Peter Nielsen from Skyguide.

The Swiss Skyguide is known for negligent attitude of officials to official duties and absence of strict instructions on various non-standard cases. Switzerland which initiated Vitaly Kaloyev's prevention to a plane crash site, refuses to recognize fault, didn't bring apologies and refuses to pay compensations to families of victims.

Cynical actions of the German government, disposed to arrest Vitaly Kaloyev at the airport, caused indignation of the Russian citizens. Russians force Putin to maintaining sanctions against the unfriendly state guilty of death of million citizens of Russia in days of the Second World War.

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 04/07/2012 @ 13:10
The new wave of the anti-Russian actions in the Japan kingdom, in connection with visit of the Russian Far East islands by the Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev, again can activate unknown seismic activity near the archipelago Japan.

Mother Earth is the difficult live organism which is painfully reacting to surge of negative human emotions, aggression and hatred manifestations. Earthquakes, hurricanes, floods are response to cruelty and violence.


 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 05/07/2012 @ 09:24
Millions of poor Americans will be without health care
                                                
                                                
04.07.2012



Millions of Americans will be poorer without the benefits of health reform after Republican states apply a paragraph of the judgment of the Supreme Court in order to escape administrative responsibilities. About 16 states ruled by Republicans threatened not to implement the clause providing for the expansion of the insurance bill proposed by President Barack Obama two years ago.
   
Another seven states have criticized the White House program and also indicated that they do not support the statutes of the new health system. If the boycott case materializes, some 11 million people will be out of federal help.

Last week, the Supreme Court ratified much of the regulatory reform of Obama, but clarified that the Oval Office cannot force or fine governments in the case of clause expansion.

This order, virtually suspended by the Supreme Court, required the states to include in the plan help those adult citizens with incomes below 133% of the federal poverty level, currently at $14,400 annually.

Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, and Indiana are among the states that have announced their opposition to the expansion.

Also, Texas, where the law would benefit two million people, said no to the program claiming that its cost would be $27 billion in two years.

Approved in 2010 under the name of the Affordable Care Act, national health reform is presented by the Democratic Party as the biggest political success of the head of state since the federal administration of Harry S. Truman had failed when trying to implement it.

The new regulations, which do not take effect until 2014, force millions of Americans to buy insurance from combined private and government Medicaid under penalty of having to pay a fine to the state.

This controversial paragraph, nearly $1.7 trillion that will be paid by the treasury, led to numerous protests and criticism mainly from the the Republican contingent, until the discontent resulted in a court dispute.

The cost of medical insurance for many Americans in 2011 rose more sharply than in previous years, which offset at the same time any increase in wages.

A study by the nongovernmental group Kaiser Family Foundation revealed that the average annual expenditure of employers for family coverage reached the figure of U.S. $15,073, a figure that represented an increase of 9% compared to 2010.
   
Source: Prensa Latina


Translated from the Portuguese version by:

   
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 05/07/2012 @ 09:33
Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs received an assignment about the annual publication of the report on observance of human rights in the USA, in Great Britain, in France, in Canada and in other countries which are considered as a stronghold of democracy and observance of human rights. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China also intends to give a place to observance of the civil rights in the developed countries on pages of the annual report.

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 07/07/2012 @ 07:40
Can Americans Escape the Deception?


July 4, 2012


By Paul Craig Roberts

Hot Air Day is upon us. On July 4 hot air will spew forth all over the country as dignitaries deliver homilies to our freedom and democracy and praise our brave troops who are protecting our freedom by killing them over there before they come over here.

Not a single one of these speeches will contain one word of truth. No speaker will lament the death of the US Constitution or urge his audience to action to restore the only document that protects their liberty. No speaker will acknowledge that in the 21st century the Bush/Obama Regime, with the complicity of the Department of Justice, federal courts, Congress, presstitute media, law schools, bar associations, and an insouciant public have murdered the Constitution in the name of the war on terror.

As in medieval times, American citizens can be thrown into dungeons and never accounted for. No evidence or charges need be presented to a court. No trial is required, and no conviction.

As in tyrannies, US citizens can be executed at the sole discretion of the despot in the Oval Office, who sits there drawing up lists of people to be murdered.

Protestors exercising their constitutionally guaranteed rights to freedom of speech and freedom of association are attacked by armed police, beaten, tasered, tear-gassed, pepper sprayed, and arrested.

Whistleblowers who report the governments crimes are prosecuted despite the statute that protects them.

US soldier Bradley Manning, who allegedly gave Wikileaks the documents revealing US war crimes, including the video of US soldiers in a helicopter gunship enjoying themselves murdering civilians walking along the street as if the soldiers were playing a video game, has been arrested and held in conditions of torture while the government tries to invent a case against him.

According to the US Military Code, US soldiers are required to make war crimes known. However, the law on the books provided no protection to Bradley Manning, and conservative Republicans whom I know are foaming at the mouth for Manning to be executed for letting out the truth. The truth, what is mere truth compared to the exceptionalism of the great american people? America has carte blanche to do whatever it wishes to the unexceptional peoples. Manning deserves to die, they say, because he took the side of the oppressed and not the side of the amerikan oppressors.

After the Swedish prosecutorial office dropped the case against Wikileaks Julian Assange, ruling that the charges of rape had no foundation, another prosecutor, many believe at the urging of the US government, demanded Assange be extradited from England in order to be questioned. Normally, extradition only applies to those who have been charged with a crime and for whom a warrant has been issued, which is most certainly not the case with Assange. But, of course, if Washington wants Assange, Washington will be sure every law is broken or bent until they get him. The Swedish puppet will do the exceptional countrys will and be paid well for its service.

Peace activists in several states had their homes invaded by FBI, computers and personal records taken, and a grand jury was convened in an attempt to indict them for supporting terrorism by their protests of Washingtons illegal wars, wars that are war crimes under the Nuremberg standard established by the US government itself.

None of this will be mentioned in July 4 patriotic speeches. The inebriated masses will be wrapped in the flag and return home full of the hubris that despises lesser foreigners, such as Muslims, Arabs, Chinese, and the French.

And no dignitary will mention that those that we are killing over there are mainly women, children, village elders, and aid workers. The US troops seem to specialize in soft targets like weddings, funerals, kids soccer games, farm houses, and schools.

Recently Washington reduced the collateral damage count by declaring every murdered male of military age to have been a Taliban fighter or terrorist. Obviously, Washington has no way of knowing whether they were or not, but Washingtons declaration is intended as a green light to murder Afghan males of military age.

Currently, Washington has wars underway, or occupations, or is violating the sovereignty of countries with drones and/or troops in seven Muslim countries, and is arming rebels in Syria. All of this is being done without the constitutionally-required authorization by Congress, allegedly the peoples representatives. What a joke!

In short, in freedom and democracy america, the people have no voice and no rights and no representatives.

Yet, this huge deficit of democracy and liberty will pass unmentioned by July 4th orators.

The crimes against humanity, the dismantling of the US Constitution and the lawlessness both domestic and international that define 21st century amerika are the results of September 11, 2001.

Washingtons account of 9/11 is the wildest conspiracy theory known to mankind. The absurdity of Washingtons account is as follows: A few Saudi Arabians without any governments backing or that of any intelligence service outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, even the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, together with the intelligence agencies of all of Washingtons NATO allies and Israels Mossad, which has infiltrated every radical Muslim group.

These humble Saudis of no known distinction or powers also simultaneously outwitted the National Security Council, NORAD, the Pentagon, Air Traffic Control, and caused Airport Security to fail four times in one hour on the same morning.

In other words, every part of Americas defenses failed at the same moment.

Think about that for a minute. If such a thing had actually happened, the President, Vice President, Congress, and media would have been demanding to know how such universal failure of every aspect of the national security state was possible. An investigation would have started immediately, not over a year later as a result of pressure from 9/11 families who could not be bought off with monetary payments. Such complete and total failure of every aspect of US security would mean that americans were not safe one single minute during the 40-year stand-off with the Soviet Union. At any moment the Soviets could have utterly destroyed the US and we would never have known what hit us.

In a real investigation, the 9/11 evidence would not have been illegally destroyed, and the investigation would have been conducted by experts, not by government agencies assigned a cover-up and by political hacks. The NIST report is abject nonsense. It explains nothing. It is a fabricated computer simulation of a non-event. The co-chairmen and legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission later wrote books in which they stated that information was withheld from the commission, the military lied to the commission, and the commission was set up to fail. Yet, these astounding admissions by the leaders of the 9/11 Commission had no impact on Congress, the presstitute media, or the public. All heads were in the sand. Please, whatever you do, dont make us emotional weaklings face the facts.

More than one hundred firefighters, police, first responders, and building maintenance personnel report hearing and experiencing scores of explosions in the twin towers, including powerful explosions in the sub-basements prior to the collapse of the towers.

Distinguished scientists, authors of many peer-reviewed scientific papers, report finding unreacted nano-thermite in the dust from the towers, tested it for its explosive and high-heat producing ability, and reported the unequivocal results.

Seventeen hundred architects and engineers have testified in a petition to Congress that the three World Trade Center buildings were not brought down by fire and airplanes and have demanded a real scientific investigation of the cause of the buildings destruction.

Yet, we are left with the paradox that scientific opinion based on careful examination of the remaining evidence has been designated by the ignorant and unwashed as a conspiracy theory, while Washingtons absurd conspiracy theory stands as the truth of the event.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth headed by high-rise architect Richard Gage has driven the final nail in the coffin of Washingtons concocted conspiracy theory with its new film: 9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out, and they do speak out. Scores of top level demolition experts and experts on the design, engineering, and construction of high rise steel structures provide the scientific, architectural, and engineering reasons that the three World Trade Center buildings came down only with the assistance of explosives that were placed and timed to remove the powerful structural support and permit the sudden collapse of the buildings. As the buildings were engineered and constructed according to known and tested principles that absolutely prevent rapid collapse, fire and structural damage that two of the three skyscrapers suffered from airliners could not possibly have caused the sudden disintegration of the three buildings.

I saw the film in Atlanta on July 2. Atlanta was a stop on the 32-city premier of the film. The film was shown at the 7 Stages Theater on Euclid Avenue, the former Euclid Theater to which 65 years ago we kids used to ride our bikes to see Tarzan battle giant reptiles and ride elephants to victory over evil black tribesmen or evil white hunters, or to watch Randolph Scott bring justice with his six-shooter to a town ruled by black hats, or to witness the brave American soldiers liberate Europe from the Nazis. We never dreamed that we, residents of the land of the free would be menaced by a gestapo police state.

Americas descent into a gestapo police state could be arrested, perhaps, if americans were not so ignorant of science or were capable of even realizing that what they see with their own eyes when they watch videos of the twin towers destruction is buildings blowing up, not buildings falling down from structural damage. Building 7s destruction is the total and complete picture of controlled demolition.

At the end of the powerful film, psychologists explain why the majority of a population lacks the mental and emotional strength to confront highly disturbing facts. A government that so thoroughly spies on its population as Washington does obviously knows its populations profile and sees nothing but weakness and fear that can be manipulated.

What fact is more disturbing than the likely fact that 9/11 was a false flag event designed to provide the neoconservatives with their new Pearl Harbor in order to launch Washingtons Wars of Hegemony in the Middle East, and from there to Iran and to the nuclear powers: Russia and China, which are being encircled, as Iran has been, with US military bases?

What we are experiencing is a replay of the French Revolution, this time on a world stage. Napoleon, the inheritor of the French Revolution, conquered Europe several times in the effort to expand the New Order in France to all of Europe. The French Revolution was the first claim of a New World Order, but at that time the world
was Europe.

Washingtons wars of liberation are wars of world hegemony and wars of massive profits for the military/security complex. The combination of power and money that are the motives for Washingtons concocted wars are hidden motives, wrapped in the flag, patriotic sentiments, and fear of dark-skinned demonized Muslims.

Can Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth or any truth break through and liberate americans from the artificial reality created by government liars and a corrupt presstitute media, or are americans doomed to expire in the Matrix that has been created for them?

Perhaps the hope is that the economy will collapse under the would-be hegemons, and people who will not fight for principles and their liberty will fight for their economic survival.


Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments and is Contributing Editor to Gerald Celentes Trends Journal.


PaulCraigRoberts.org
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 08/07/2012 @ 08:07
The Tiger desired human blood again and over hundred states united in one hyenas pack and they desired to try human blood too. The Great Creator sees everything. The mankind is doomed to extinction. Natural cataclysms will accrue every day and will accelerate this process. Mother Earth will have a rest from a people's civilization very long. The new human race will occupy Earth one million years later. The Creator hopes that new people become cleverer, kinder, more spiritually than the previous defective settlers of Earth. God's trade is executed.   
   
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 22/07/2012 @ 20:49
Batman massacre: Time for the USA to take stock
                                                
                                                
22.07.2012

Turn on a television set these days, and the chances are that within a short space of time you will see images of terrified Americans fleeing in panic from a building where some lunatic has run amok with a weapon, massacring people at random in a mindless act of mass murder. Isn't it time the Americans took a good look at themselves?

The Batman massacre was carried out by a brilliant young man, a Ph.D. medical student. Why? Not because he was unbalanced, not because he had issues with himself or his school, not because he had issues with a girlfriend... but because he had easy access to weapons. And that is the bottom line under the many massacres committed in the United States of America. A Google search reveals a shocking yet telling list of tragedies which have left countless families devastated.

And the bottom line is this: young males, Caucasian mainly, Anglo-Saxonic in origin bar very few, and the tale stretches from the USA to the UK to Australia. In many countries, when you are a teenager, your birthday present when you are thirteen or fourteen or fifteen and so on is a machine gun. It does not mean you use it, it means you have the potential to use it. In the USA, it is beyond doubt that there is a huge potential for an incident to happen in a population of 300 million, fed on 100,000 scenes of extreme violence on TV/computer games/images before the age of thirteen.

Especially when in the majority of States it is a question of filling in a form, with ID, waiting three days for a check on mental health issues and criminal record (as if a criminal would buy a gun legally anyway) and then you can buy your gun, ammunition and even gunpowder. How much sense does that make in this day and age? None, but then again common sense doesn't speak for much in the United States of America, does it?

It's all about lobbies and agencies and NGO's controlling Washington, neutering any President who dares to stand for "Change" (look at how high Obama squeals as Clinton holds his anatomy...after he allegedly paid half her election campaign expenses...why??), spreading freedom and democracy overseas as terrorists are created and supported, officials are corrupted, civilian structures are strafed with military hardware, so that contracts can be shared out among White House cronies.

In fact the US policy overseas is a mirror image of these massacres at home. As some lunatic steps into a cinema saying he is The Joker and murders people indiscriminately, in the ultimate attack against freedom, Americans are burning Korans, urinating on corpses, torturing people, committing cyber terrorist attacks, trying to silence the alternative media. I know what I am speaking about.

Is this what the Founding Fathers stand for? Is this the psyche of your Average American? While some people say it is, those of us who know Americans and speak to them know perfectly well it is not. The people of the USA are, like anywhere else, horrified by violence and as victims themselves of terrorism on 9/11, have first-hand experience of it.

What the average American does not know is that 9/11s are handed out by American pilots overseas on a shockingly frequent basis and that Batman massacres have occurred almost daily in a growing number of countries round the globe over the last few decades.

Maybe it is time for the American people to take stock of who and what they have become and to do something about it. Voting for the same old same old...may give them a sense of security, but what has changed? Nothing.

And nothing changes as regards access to lethal weapons. We all know that 99% of Americans are decent, law-abiding citizens and are family and community-oriented which is most commendable. But give one per cent of 300 million people access to a weapon, and they are going to use it. Those who need a power game to gain kudos are going to use the opportunity because in their "real life" it is never going to happen. They know that and the "id" inside their mind knows it. The rest is the murderous history witnessed by a Google "Massacre America" search. This part of the equation is a constant factor, it will happen again, and it will happen time and time and time again.

So, citizens of America, you send your sons and daughters to school with a kiss and a hug. Do you know if they will come back home again? Or will you have to visit them, kissing their frigid and pale faces lying in a coffin? True, your government renders thousands of families around the world sobbing and crying and hating your country because its heroic pilots and armed forces do the same thing overseas...

However that does not mean that those of us who know what is going on in Syria and Iran wish you any harm. Like me, Syria and Iran want peace, and freedom from the terrorists your country supports just like you want to send your families out to see a movie without fear of being massacred by a nutcase with a gun.

The only way this is going to be solved is if the USA has a serious reflection on the availability of weapons and issues concrete laws like those in force in those countries where it is nearly impossible to buy a gun (look and learn) and this may be a first step towards countering the murderous policies of Washington that get all Americans such a bad name. Suppose we all live together in peace?

That means not supporting terrorist elements abroad and creating false flag events to create a casus belli, such as those rumoured for the London Olympics. They speak about Iran and Syria. Maybe someone should check more closely and see who or what is behind any attempt. It sure as heck isn't Iran or Syria, believe me...
   
               
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 23/07/2012 @ 15:09
Sanctions of the European Union concerning Iran and Syria have negative impact on an economic situation of the European countries and an Euro exchange rate in relation to the main world currencies. The European economy won't sustain consequences of political decisions of EU directed on blasting economy of the Middle Eastern and North African countries. The economy of any country is connected from world economy and pulling of an economic aorta of one country causes deterioration of health of world economy as a whole.

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 27/07/2012 @ 09:21
The plan of a business community of the USA and Israel about creation of the new pro-American state Great Kurdistan more isn't secret. The Kurdish state will be formed on territories of the former states of Turkey, Iraq, Syria.

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 31/07/2012 @ 14:35
up_immagini/sana077.jpg

Mitt Romney, the open and honest American guy without dark pages in his biography, can achieve what false Barack Obama and his nonprofessional team couldn't achieve. Mitt Romney as the firm American guy, can endure death of two American fleet, trebling of the oil prices and the dollar depreciation.
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 02/08/2012 @ 18:09
The Nobel committee breaks Alfred Nobel's will


up_immagini/obamanobel.jpg

Excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel: "and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.

The American aircrafts bombs Pakistan once in every week. The American army moved from Iraq to Afghanistan and kills, forces and plunders peace Afghans daily. The American president cast the prospering Libya into chaos and ruin, killed tens of thousands of Libyans and doomed to exile of one hundred thousands Libyans. The American president encourages activity of terrorist groups in the Middle East and helps to Al-Qaeda for win in Syria. Americans managed to kill Osama bin Laden who died and was buried in Egypt in 2001. Doubler of Osama bin Laden died in 2006. Murder of the leader of Al-Qaeda is thought up for branch of suspicions on communication with al-Qaeda from Barack Obama.

Nevertheless the Nobel Peace Prize 2009 was awarded to Barack H. Obama "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples".

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 16/08/2012 @ 10:26
Serious vulnerability in antinuclear defense of the United States of America and also vulnerability of two American fleet, not capable to resist to air and underwater attacks, were revealed during tactical trainings of the Russian Navies and the Air Force. The Russian nuclear submarines were in a coastal zone of the United States during very long time. Besides, the Russian submarines were under the bottom of two American aircraft carriers not less than an hour, the Russian deck aircrafts came on a position of attack and weren't found by air defenses systems of the American aircraft carriers.

Barack Obama's Presidential Administration affords considerable financial costs of war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Syria, but the small part of budget money is spent for defense and safety of citizens of the United States of America. The enormous military budget doesn't do USA by the country safe and ready to defense.

 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 17/08/2012 @ 13:29
Syria, the UN and accountability
                                                         
                                                      
17.08.2012

The UN set up an Independent International Commission of Enquiry into the Syrian conflict to apportion the blame for atrocities, which it has attributed to both the western-backed "opposition" terrorist forces and to the Syrian Government forces trying to protect the country against this scourge.

Where was the UNO when the massacres were taking place between Hutu and Tutsi fighters in Rwanda and Burundi? Where was the UNO when Kosovo and Yugoslavia were being strafed by NATO? Where was the UNO when Iraq's crops were being set on fire by NATO military aircraft?

Where was the UNO in the run-up to the attack on Iraq, when its inspectors failed to find any Weapons of Mass Destruction and when the US Secretary of State was lying through his teeth at its own Headquarters in New York? Where was the UNO when the Indonesians were massacring the Maubere people in East Timor, when western powers were turning a blind eye and arming the Government and when Portugal was practically the only player on the international scene making its voice heard on the issue?

Where was the UNO when corporate interests were merged with the humanitarian disaster relief in Haiti?

Where was the UNO when the attack was launched on Afghanistan in 2001 three years after Mullah Omar had allegedly refused a bribe from the USA to build a pipeline across his country so that western assets in Central Asia could reach the Indian ocean? Where was the UNO when Iraq was attacked outside the auspices of the UNSC and while the UN Charter itself was being defecated on by FUKUS countries the UK and US?

Where was the UNO when Libya was attacked without any motive, when false flag events and lies in the media created the hype to go in and save the people from being bombed by the Air Force? Where were the bombs, as Saif al-Islam al-Qathafi asked Sky News as they took him around, a study in embarrassment, to show him the places they said had been bombed the day before? Of course, there were none.

Where was the UNO as the FUKUS Axis (France, UK and US) strafed civilian structures with military hardware, where was the UNO when the FUKUS Axis destroyed the Libyan water supply - an essential item, constituting a war crime - where was the UNO when Libya's electricity grid was destroyed to "break the people's backs"?

Where was the UNO as terrorists were trained and supported by the FUKUS Axis not because Colonel Gaddafi was attacking them but because his humanitarian projects across Africa were costing the lobbies which close ranks behind the western governments too much money?

So now the UNO pontificates on the Syrian question, where the Government has every right to protect itself and its people against this terrorist filth, 75% of which is composed of foreigners, and states that the Government AND the terrorists are guilty?

An observation: No terrorists, no problem.
               
                        
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 17/08/2012 @ 19:13
Russian Embassy in London attacked
   
   
17.08.2012
   
   
In the night 16/17 August 2012 the consular section of the Russian Embassy in London was attacked by a mob chanting slogans against the Syrian government and throwing stones towards the building. Several windows were broken, there has been a significant damage to the house. Fortunately none of the Embassy staff were injured.   
   
The police that arrived at the scene, regretfully, did not take measures to stop the continuing unsanctioned rally or detain the attackers.   
   
This is not the first case of vandalism against the Russian Embassy in London this year.   
   
We view the incident as a new case of violation of the principle of inviolability of diplomatic missions in London.   
   
Due to the need to repair of the damage caused to the Embassy by the attack occurred in the night 16/17 August 2012 the consular section of the Russian Embassy in London will open for applicants on 17 August from noon (the Visa application centre will work as usual).   
   
Apologies for any inconvenience caused.   
   
PHOTO REPORT: http://www.rusemb.org.uk/activity/92   
   
http://www.rusemb.org.uk/press/834
 
Admin
A
: 2653
: 89
: 2001

Offline
: 18/08/2012 @ 15:27
This time the civilization of Angels doesn't intend to stop existence of the NASA's Mars Science Laboratory "Curiosity" and will provide for it the accident-free environment of existence for the entire period of operation. But Angels will continue to destroy any aircraft, drones, the rockets breaking the Syrian air space and bearing threat to citizens of Syria.

 
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]


@Mail.ru - counter

free counters