ru en
New Nuremberg for NATO crimes
Автор Тема Admin (26/10/2011 @ 21:39)
Заголовок : New Nuremberg for NATO crimes
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 13/02/2012 @ 15:50
Libya: NATO's worst crime
                                                   
                                                
12.02.2012   
   
   
Lies, deceit, blackmail, bullying, murder, torture, concentration camps, destruction of property, looting, massacres... all these words pale into insignificance when we look at what NATO has done in Libya - and intends to do to Syria within a few days. The sickening evidence coming out of Libya underlines what we are dealing with.   
   
It is very difficult to imagine that Messrs. Cameron, Hague, Sarkozy, Jupp'e;, Obama and Hillary Clinton are happy with their legacy in Libya. In fact, what they have done there would lead any normal human being to the depths of desperation; in a professional context, it would involve a dismissal and in a military one, a court martial or a dishonourable discharge.   
   
NATO's mission in Libya was to impose a no-fly zone to protect innocent civilians. Quite how anyone could have been so naïve as to believe that, after what NATO did in Iraq, defies logic; quite how anyone could have believed them as they promised to fill in the details later, ditto. But the international community once again gave NATO the benefit of the doubt and once again NATO performed on cue: another massacre, another example of arming terrorists, more killings, more violence, more torching of property, more torture, more rapes and another generation of children with their futures dashed to ruins.   
   
Another country bites the dust? If God exists and if Satan does not rule this world already, then Libya can and must be NATO's last stand; right must defeat wrong; good must triumph over evil; the Demon must be slain and NATO must lose any power it had.   
   
I have been privy to some horrific images on you.tube, of children with their faces blasted off by NATO pilots from 30,000 feet, after NATO refused to allow the Libyan authorities to hold a free and fair election. And now, we receive images of a full NATO onslaught against the defenders of Sirte as freedom and democracy was imposed upon the citizens of Libya, we receive evidence of the Libyan terrorist NTC forces attacking a hospital, under the full cover of NATO. So vicious was the attack on the hospital in Sirte, by NATO's terrorists, that the Red Cross was unable to deliver supplies.   
   
We receive evidence of NTC attacks against Red Cross personnel trying to get medical supplies into Sirte. Preventing access for aid is a war crime by the NTC and by NATO for strafing the positions of the authorities.   
   
We receive evidence that NATO was using helicopters to fire missiles into Sirte, despite the fact that its mission was to impose a no-fly zone. Gaddafi was right: the UNO panders to the whims of the FUKUS-Axis (France, UK, US and Israel)and does not use the same weight and measure when dealing with smaller nations.   
   
Today, Libya is in chaos. Clashes in Alkufira: many terrorists killed; clashes in Sebha - many terrorists killed. And to cap it all, ethnic cleansing by NATO's NTC terrorists - attacks against a refugee camp on the outskirts of Tripoli - one thousand five hundred refugees strafed with machinegun fire by the NTC terrorists backed by NATO, by Cameron, by Hague, by Clinton, by Obama, by Sarkozy, by Jupp'e.   
   
The terrorists in this case came from Misratah and strafed the refugees, chanting racist slogans. Why? Because many of the residents were Negroes from Tawergha, which was the victim of ethnic cleansing from the Misratah brigades. Let this be the legacy of NATO for humanity: it supported racists, it supported terrorists, it supported rapists and now, Libya is in chaos.   
   
Let us ask Messrs. Cameron, Sarkozy, Obama, Hague, Juppe' and Hillary "War Zone" Clinton if they are satisfied at what they have done.   
   
The legacy of these demons is clear to see in Libya today, visible in the slogans painted along the roads: "the brigade [Misrata brigade] for purging slaves and black skin"; "drastic measures like banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata."   
   
Congratulations, NATO!   
   
            
                  
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 01/03/2012 @ 14:37
NATO MASONRY OVERALL OBJECTIVE: CHRISTIANITY DESTRUCTION


One and a half million Christians lived in Iraq before NATO aggression. No more than 150 thousand Christians live in Iraq today. More than one million Iraq Christians sends a shelter in Syria. More than hundred thousand Christians ran to Syria from Libya "released" by NATO bombardments. All Christian temples are plundered and destroyed in "the democratized" Libya. Hundred thousand Christians of Copts ran to Syria from revolutionary Egypt.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 02/03/2012 @ 10:24
Pope Benedict XVI has renounced God.
         
         
         
Sarkozy & Merkel's military adventure has suffered the big failure in Syria. Captured French both German soldiers and officers, including two colonels, ask to recognize their status as prisoners of war. Whether Syria can recognize soldiers from the countries of the NATO which aren't at war with Syria officially as prisoners of war?!!! Whether Syria can recognize terrorists as prisoners of war?!!         
         
NATO soldiers shot at the Syrian soldiers from Christian quarters, provoking reciprocal fire, c hope that Christians who don't understand happiness from "democratization" of Syria and support the Syrian power, will be killed by the Syrian soldiers. It complicated and slowed down clearing of a city from terrorists.         
         
Soldiers of the French foreign legion have killed the priest, some parishioners and tried to destroy Church of Umm Al Zunnar (the Virgin's Girdle). NATO soldiers used one of the main relics of the Christian world as a toilet. The Syrian soldiers have released the Temple from interventionists, but the cathedral has numerous damages.   
   
up_immagini/sana003.jpg up_immagini/sana004.jpg       
         
Homs is an ancient city dating back to the year 2300 B.C and was known in Roman times as Emesa. Christianity was established in Emesa early on, as 3rd to 7th century. Catacombs were found in houses in the eastern quarter, where quite a large population of Christians still live. Homs was taken in 636 by the Muslims, who renamed it Homs, and the city's large Christian element was eliminated during the rebellion of 855. The Church of Umm Al Zunnar (the Virgin's Girdle) which was named after a piece of cloth said to have belonged to the Virgin Mary that was found underneath the alter during renovations in the 1950's.         
         
Archbishop Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger who has involved Sacred Curia in an Antichristian coalition, has lost the Divine good fortune and he should will be defrocked as the apostate.         
         
God will send a clear and unequivocal sign to all Christians in the near future.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 02/03/2012 @ 18:55
Martyr death for Jesus Christ


The prior of the Church of Umm Al Zunnar (the Virgin's Girdle) has had time to send the Virgin's Girdle and a little especially honored icons to Damascus for rescue from terrorists.

Soldiers of the French foreign legion, having rushed into a temple, have started to shoot at icons.

The priest who tried to stop church robbers, has accepted martyr death for Christianity.

St. George's temple also has been plundered and destroyed in Homs, as well as many other Christian temples in Homs.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 04/03/2012 @ 07:10






Exposed: The handbook of American State Terrorism - (1)
                                                   
                                                   
04.03.2012


Special Forces Unconventional Warfare is the name of the document. November 2010, 97 pages long, it is a manual which exposes the modus operandi of the United States of America's foreign policy; in it we can read the recent Libyan history and understand what is planned for Syria and Iran. "Destroy by any method what will prevent disclosure". Hmm...



Special Forces Unconventional Warfare. Wow, what an interesting publication that I have discovered. I found a copy of it lying on the floor at the...er... airport (cough). I wonder whether it is a novel...let us see. Certainly, this is the end of the American colour revolutions.

Well, it has a destruction notice right on page one: "DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document." Shall we see why? Let's see what the United States of America gets up to...

Here is the preface: "Training Circular (TC) 18-01, Special Forces Unconventional Warfare, defines the current United States (U.S.) Army Special Forces (SF) concept of planning and conducting unconventional warfare (UW) operations. For the foreseeable future, U.S. forces will predominantly engage in irregular warfare (IW) operations."

Well that sort of sets the tone of the rest of the document ladies and gentlemen, doesn't it? It also gives us a pretty good insight into what happened in Libya, where a socially progressive government was unseated by terrorists armed by the author-country of this document and supported by the FUKUS-Axis (France, UK, US and Israel).

Chapter One, Overview. A quote: "There is another type of warfare-new in its intensity, ancient in its origin-war by guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins; war by ambush instead of by combat, by infiltration instead of aggression, seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him. It preys on unrest.

President John F. Kennedy, 1962"

Guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins. Unrest. Basically, a policy based upon illegal intrusion and murder. How legal is that?

Chapter One 1.2: "1-2. Enabling a resistance movement or insurgency entails the development of an underground and guerrilla forces..."

Page 7: Definition of Insurgency: "An organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict. Code: JP 3-05"

Section 1-22: "1-22. A genuine willingness to collaborate and cooperate with the United States must exist within the leadership of the indigenous force."

Section 1-28, on feasibility: "1-28. The normal areas of concern that make up a feasibility assessment are as follows:
Are there groups that could develop into a viable force with assistance?
Is the United States in contact with or can it make contact with individuals representing the resistance potential in an area?
Are there any capable leaders, whose goals are compatible with U.S. goals who are willing to cooperate with the United States?
Can the United States influence the leaders to remain compliant with U.S. goals?
Are the groups' tactics and battlefield conduct acceptable by the standards established in Field Manual (FM) 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare, and to the U.S. population?
Will the environment geographically and demographically support resistance operations?
Is the enemy effectively in control of the population?
Is the potential gain worth the potential risk? Is this group's participation politically acceptable to other regional partners?"

Interesting, bullet point 5. So acceptable to the US population would be illegal detention of prisoners without right to due legal process, without the right to see a lawyer, without an accusation even.   Acceptable to the US population is sodomy of prisoners, urinating in food, forcing Moslems to eat pork, sleep deprival and water-boarding? Which medieval torture chamber or Nazi concentration camp did THESE monsters crawl out of?

There is more, much, much more. The immediate response ladies and gentlemen will be a hacking attack, after which there will be attempts to intimidate me through threats on my life, after which there will be attempts, real. I have been there before.

I would prefer to die fighting against evil than be silenced through cowardice. The document here exposed is the blueprint of US foreign policy and what is stated here is the tip of the iceberg. Perhaps the allies of the USA will consider their relationship through NATO, but then again, perhaps they won't. After all, a coward is a coward.

               
                  
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 08/03/2012 @ 20:24
The higher heavenly forces, the Lord and angelic troops, attentively trace events on the Earth. Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya. Now Syria. Hundred thousand the human lives which have been taken away by the American soldiery and the American avidity, cause grief and indignation of the Father Heavenly. The United States of America will be punished. The asteroid, a volcano, two thousand tornado - the mechanism is started. The first symptoms will be shown in a week.

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 11/03/2012 @ 19:18
US soldier shoots 17 civilians dead in Kandahar


by Bashir Ahmad Nadem. & Javed Hamim Kakaron[/big]

Mar 11, 2012 - 11:39


[big]KABUL/KANDAHAR (PAN): A US soldier of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) was detained on Sunday in connection with shooting dead at least 17 Afghan civilians in the southern province of Kandahar, officials said.
   
The incident took place on Sunday morning when a US soldier opened fire at four houses in Zangabad area of Panjwae district, killing the civilians and injuring five others, said Hajji Agha Lalai, a member of provincial council in the district.
   
He told Pajhwok Afghan News that local residents told him over telephone that the injured were rushed to the ISAF health facility in Kandahar.
   
However, Governor Toryalay Weesa said a US soldier opened fire on civilians this morning outside the ISAF base in Panjwae district.
   
The exact number of civilian casualties is yet to be confirmed but a delegation was sent to the area for further investigation.
   
Without mentioning the exact location of the incident, an ISAF statement said US force and Afghan authorities would jointly conduct a probe on the incident and later release more details of the shooting.
   
“This is a deeply regrettable incident and we extend our thoughts and concerns to the families involved,” the statement added.
   
Detailed story to follow soon.
   
myn/vp

Pajhwok Afghan News
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 12/03/2012 @ 14:29

Afghanistan: Another NATO massacre
                                                   
                                                   
11.03.2012


NATO calls him a "rogue" soldier who snapped after having a breakdown and then (sigh) out come the violins and the apologies (what a drag eh?), well, expressions of "regret". Rogue? After peeing on corpses, burning the Koran, urinating in food, sodomizing Islamic prisoners and setting dogs on people? This is not a one-off. It's another NATO massacre.

The pathetic acting of the NATO spokespersons on camera makes you want to throw up. The representatives of the same organization that masterminded massive breaches of international law, which perpetrated acts of murder and slaughter against civilians across the globe, have the audacity to look the camera in the eye and say they regret the loss of civilian lives in Afghanistan.

In "civilian lives" read NINE CHILDREN and at least THREE WOMEN, slaughtered by yet another American coward who went on the rampage last night, murdering eleven people in one house, moving on to another and murdering four more then one in another house. Sixteen civilians, 9 of whom were children and at least four other civilians injured and hospitalised is the tally of this maniac.

Let us remember NATO for what NATO is and let us remember what NATO has done in recent years. Supposedly a defensive organization formed to counter any aggressive ambitions of the Warsaw Pact (which was always a defensive alliance itself), NATO gave guarantees to the latter that it would not encroach eastwards. What happened? It encroached eastwards.

So do we believe a word NATO says? Like we believe the siren-songs of a desperate heroin consumer in the last stages of withdrawal but then again, NATO and heroin have had a little romance in Afghanistan, as we can see, or rather used to see, before they were removed from the Net, in those photos which showed US soldiers apparently standing guard over opium poppy-fields. They also removed the videos of US aircraft burning fields of cereals in Iraq in the 1990s.

If today's massacre were a one-off, then fair enough, it was a soldier who snapped. But even then, you do not waltz into a foreign country and let loose this type of lunatic on the civilian population. If you train a man and give him an automatic weapon, you are accountable and it is hoped the USA will produce lawyers who will sue their administration or Pentagon on behalf of the victims' families.

However, it was not a one-off. It comes as the latest in a string of demonic and barbaric acts by NATO, the organization responsible for the illegal act of slaughter in Iraq against every fibre of international law. Who was it that detained people illegally? Who was it that urinated in their food? Who forced Moslems to eat pork? Who set dogs on people who had been kidnapped?

Who sodomized Moslems while under detention? Who forced Moslems to lie in piles and commit sadistic and perverted sexual acts upon one another? Who lied about the casus belli in Iraq? Who lied about the casus belli in Libya? Who is lying about Syria? Who is lying about Iran? Who tortured people? Who had people tortured on CIA flights and on CIA camps overseas and on CIA vessels? Who holds detainees at Guantanamo illegally, without due legal process, without even an accusation? For years?

Who trained terrorists in Libya and then used them to commit the most horrific acts against women and children? Who let loose gangs of racists and rapists and murderers in Libya? Who is behind the arming of terrorists in Syria in a re-run of Libya? How many massacres of wedding parties has NATO committed in Afghanistan?

What about the urinating on corpses, what about the burning of the Koran? What about the US driver who rammed into civilian vehicles provoking countless victims?

In fact, rather than issuing lame "oh dear, sorry!" comments, after failing to say anything when the grandchildren of Colonel Gaddafi had freedom and democracy imposed upon them from 30,000 feet, why doesn't NATO admit it has lost its way, that it is losing in Afghanistan, that the only way it extricated itself from Iraq was by paying "insurgents" not to attack, as indeed it is paying the Talebaan not to attack in Afghanistan, and pack up its bags and f*ck off back home, cowed, cowering and hated by the entire world community?

The world has had enough of NATO and its murderous policies, invasions, bombings, strafing of civilian structures with military hardware, interference in the affairs of sovereign states and massacres. NATO is the enemy of humanity. Nato Is a Terrorist Organization.

An Activist is a Terrorist who buys NATO arms; a Terrorist is an Activist who does not.
               
                  
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 16/03/2012 @ 11:04
Did Israel strafe civilians with aircraft?
                                                      
                                                   
16.03.2012    

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Q9sjdb5iI6w
funeral march for a 12-year-old boy, Ayoub Assaleya,
killed in Israeli airstrike on Gaza 11/03/2012

   


Much is said of the so-called "atrocities" by the authorities in countries like Libya, Syria, Iran and so on. Much is said of Iran's nuclear program. Many accusations are made about "clampdowns" against "civilians" by brutal regimes but...do Libya, Syria and Iran strafe schools with phosphorous?
   
What is said about the documented terrorist strikes with phosphorous against Gaza schools (Search for "Gaza phosphorous")? What is said about the arming and funding of terrorist groups by Occidental countries to create havoc inside sovereign states? Did anyone document the horrific crimes carried out by the "rebels" in Libya? Has anyone documented the atrocities carried out by the "rebels" in Syria?
   
Why, SKY News stood by two days ago filming a group of vandals destroying a Syrian Air Force jet with "small arms" and called it a "victory". Suppose one invited SKY News to go to a British Air Force base, whereupon one were to trash an entire fleet of aircraft, would they call that a "resounding victory"?
   
No, they would call it a terrorist attack. So Iran cannot have a peaceful nuclear programme but Israel can sit on nuclear warheads buried away in the desert and nobody says boo?

So where do we stand on the recent clashes between Palestinians and the Israeli Defence Force in Gaza? The clashes began on March 9 when Israel carried out a terrorist attack, murdering Zohair al-Qaisi, the Secretary-General of the Popular Resistance Committees (PRCs), justified by Tel Aviv because he was planning to carry out a terrorist attack himself. Where is the evidence?
   
Shall we examine the evidence Israel used? It claims the Popular Resistance Committees were responsible for a previous terrorist attack against Eilat last Summer. However, it was then proven that the perpetrators of this terrorist attack entered Israel through Egypt and not across the Gaza border.
   
The Palestinians retaliated to this attack by firing 300 rockets at Israel, in which 23 Israelis were injured. The Israelis retaliated in turn killing between 23 and 35 Palestinians and injuring a further 74. Most of the wounded are reported to be civilians and among them are many children.
   
Israel has apparently admitted it used its air force in the strikes. Where in international law is it allowed to use indiscriminate violence of this sort against areas inhabited by civilians and does the use of military aircraft against children not constitute a war crime?
   
The international mainstream (bought) media is once again quiet on this one, because of course when Israel does something everyone turns away or when an Israeli official says something, it is hushed up, denied and removed from the internet. Censorship however no longer exists and there exists something called freedom on the Press and freedom of expression, so if Israel is using military aircraft to strafe civilians, then the world has every right to know about it.

Observation: To level criticism against Israel is not being anti-Jewish. One uses the term anti-Jewish because the term "anti-Semitic" is nonsensical, since "Semitic peoples" are those speaking Semitic languages, which include Arabic and one does not use the term "racist" because the Jews are not a race.
   
There are many, including many Jews, who believe in peaceful coexistence and the UNO has sponsored many programmes which organise joint sports programmes, joint debates or joint cultural activities, favouring a developmental and non-political approach in which Palestinian and Jewish boys and girls form bonds and friendships.
   
Would the process not be that much easier if all the members of the world community accepted HAMAS as the elected authority in Gaza and as an interlocutor and would the process not be that much easier if Israel ceased building colonies on lands which do not belong to it, and if Israel started to phase out the colonies it has already built over time, paying a rent to the Palestinian Authority for the use of their lands?
   
Why does nobody in the world community raise these issues and why does everyone turn a blind eye when Israel breaks the law? Is there some aspect of world politics that has escaped me?
   
   
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 22/03/2012 @ 00:06
The French president Sarkozy hastened to accuse the French nationalists of participation in murder of the Jewish children. But Nicola Sarkozy is guilty of death of 3262 Libyan, Syrian and Palestinian children. Nicolas Sarkozy is guilty of creation of a network of Al-Qaeda which has entangled all France by the cells. Sarkozy, the main enemy of the French people, is guilty of the forthcoming murder of the French children and soldiers. To a huge regret France is on the threshold of huge shocks and experiences.

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 22/03/2012 @ 17:06
Libya without Gaddafi: Chaos and collapse
         
         
         
22.03.2012

   

Chaos, destruction and decay - this is the look of Libya, that used to be a blooming country, a year after the beginning of NATO air strikes. In mid-February of 2011, mass demonstrations demanding the resignation of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who ruled the country for 41 years, started in Libya. The protests grew into an armed confrontation between the regime and the opposition, backed by the NATO forces.
   
The opposition formed the Transitional National Council in Benghazi that was declared the only legitimate authority in the country. After several months of bombing and fighting, that cost the country nearly 50,000 casualties, the ruling regime was overthrown. Gaddafi was killed on October 20, 2011 not far from his homeland - the city of Sirte.
   
As stated by the international human rights organization Amnesty International, NATO has not conducted a full investigation into the death of civilians during the raid in Libya and has not paid compensation to the victims. According to a senior representative Donatello Rover, the NATO leadership is constantly talking about the efforts they are making to protect civilians. However, they cannot simply dismiss the data on many sacrifices and give yet another vague statement of apology without conducting a thorough investigation.

Earlier it was reported that the international experts were able to establish the fact of killing of 60 and wounding 55 civilians. In this case, as follows from the statement of Amnesty International, NATO officials have recorded 55 deaths of Libyan civilians. In addition, human rights activists say that 34 more civilians were killed in a NATO airstrike at Mazhir settlement in August of 2011.
   
In this regard, Amnesty International called on the alliance to conduct a thorough investigation into all deaths of civilians and bring the perpetrators to justice. NATO must pay compensation to the families of those killed and injured, AI said. NATO, in turn, explains that it cannot investigate the alleged deaths of civilians, as today the alliance is no longer entitled to exercise any activity on the territory of Libya.
   
In March, the UN Commission on Libya issued a report confirming the deaths of civilians in air strikes conducted by the coalition, although it was emphasized that NATO commanders made every effort to avoid it. It goes about targeted airstrikes and early warnings of impending attacks to the population.
   
According to the human rights defenders, this does not exempt NATO from the responsibility. It is no coincidence that after the publication of the report of the UN, the Russian Foreign Ministry also called for a thorough international investigation into human rights violations in Libya on the part of the alliance.
   
Additionally, the need for an investigation of the crimes of Muammar Gaddafi's regime and activity of the insurgents that may be classified as war crimes was identified.

After the fall of the regime, all the worst-case scenarios came to life in the country: the coming to power of Islamists, tribal massacres, genocide of the Tuareg and the Tubu, complete disorder in the economy and ultimately the collapse of the state.
   
A clear confirmation of this is the processes that crystallized by early March, when representatives of the eastern clans have decided to separate from the rest of the country. On March 6, according to several sources, several leaders of the Libyan tribes and a number of field commanders at the meeting in the city of Benghazi announced an important oil-rich region stretching from the city of Sirte located in the central part of Libya to the border with Egypt "semi-autonomous." That is, the profits from the operation must now be directed into the Benghazi "piggy bank".
   
Of course, this caused outrage in Tripoli, where the Transitional National Council of Libya that controls next to nothing is located. Its head Mustafa Abdel Jalil threatened to use military force against the Cyrenaica clans, unwilling to share. But his anger was over quickly, as he admitted that the authorities do not have enough power and means.
   
However, the centrifugal aspirations in Libya have historical reasons. The country, artificially cobbled together after obtaining independence in 1951, was founded as a federation of the three historical provinces: Cyrenaica (Barca), Tripolitania, and Fezzan. Single centralized management of Libya emerged only at the end of the reign of King Idris, but the unity of the country was actually strengthened in 1969 when Muammar al-Gaddafi came to power.
   
Meanwhile, the actions of the Benghazi are fraught not only with the complete collapse of the country, but also the return to civil war. The Western clans will be left with virtually nothing as a result of the actions of Benghazi because the major oil and gas fields are located in the east.
   
Perhaps, a harbinger of further bloodshed was the attack that took place in Benghazi against the unidentified demonstrators in support of separatism, resulting in deaths and injuries to six people.

Shamil Islambek, Pravda.Ru


 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 23/03/2012 @ 09:23

Lone Ranger Terrorism
                                                   
                                                   
23.03.2012


What happened in Toulouse is a form of terrorism that is more frightening and more sophisticated in its effectiveness, more chillingly cold-blooded and more evasive due to its very simplicity and absence of advanced technology. One man and his gun. A lone ranger, free to choose soft targets at will. Toulouse spawns a new age and a new twist in the tail of terrorist activity.

Mohamed Merah. 23. He will be remembered for all the worst reasons since his mind-changing conversion experience turned him from something of a bon vivant into a cold-blooded child murderer, claiming to do justice in revenge for Israeli murders of Palestinian children. This argument is not about what is an activist or a terrorist, whether an activist is a terrorist who buys weapons from NATO and a terrorist is an activist who does not; neither am I debating the question whether NATO and the FUKUS-Axis (France, UK, US and Israel) themselves perpetrate terrorist actions when they bomb children in their homes, when they strafe water supply networks and electricity grids with military equipment. Who is the terrorist, who is the activist, who is the innocent victim? Families suffer.

What is at issue here is a new chapter in terrorism, a back to basics approach which could prove to be far more devastating than sophisticated attacks using cutting edge technology. There was a Cold War story in which the Soyuz and Apollo programs arranged meetings to talk about science and not politics. One such visit consisted of a Soviet official who was invited to the USA and was warmly received with dinners, visits to laboratories and so on.

During his visit he was taken to a number of different agencies, all funded by NASA and/or the US Government, each spending billions of dollars on trying to perfect a pen that wrote in space. "The thing is, " the Soviet official was informed, "gravity makes the ink rise and not fall down to the nib. So we were wondering what you use in the USSR. What do you use to write in space?". The Soviet official smiled and said "A pencil".

I have not written this article before because I was afraid of giving someone the idea but now it has been done, we can analyse what has happened. For those in the know, France is the example and a case study in how the different security networks function together, an extremely unfriendly place for a terrorist network to operate, having a highly sophisticated vigilance, command and control system involving different levels of security and personnel.

But where was this system when a loner acquired a handgun and chose a soft target? And where would any system be if a terrorist network used word of mouth or handwritten messages on paper which was then burnt, if the members of the cells only knew each other as A, B and C and if when one member went down, another sprang up?

How effective would the security guards of any crowded shopping mall be if someone were to create an incident inside, then wait outside the entrances with an automatic weapon when everyone ran out screaming? All it takes is a handful of operationals, armed with automatic weapons (more easy to acquire than some breeds of dog) and the operation achieves a brilliant level of operational success. Terror is created, the cause is known to all, people's lives are directly affected, pressure is put on Governments.

No cell phones; no explosives, no detonators, no purchasing of chemicals, no smuggling across frontiers. Chillingly simple and devastatingly effective. And the only defence against it, is to counter the root cause, which is exactly what the terrorist is aiming to achieve.

To conclude, as we remember Mohamed Merah, let us remember the child he once was, the child that laughed and smiled and cried the tears which tasted of salt just like all tears shed by all children around the world. Let us hold governments and politicians to account who spread hatred and who wage wars, invading sovereign nations after sponsoring terrorist activity internally (as was the case with Libya) and let us, the people, concentrate on love and not hatred. Let us remember the families of the victims - French soldiers and children and let us remember that all victims of terrorism are merely going about their daily lives, like the children going to school, like the innocent civilians in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and elsewhere blasted to pieces by a terrorist in a military aircraft.

Backing missions and incentives which foster sharing and joint projects among players from different sides of conflicts is within everyone's grasp, and here the UNO has done some excellent groundbreaking work, for example but not exclusively, among children from Israel and Palestine, fostering sports events, artistic activities and meeting points.

Surely this is the way forward?

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 23/03/2012 @ 09:33
Who profits from the shootings in France?
                     
                  
23.03.2012


By Olivia Kroth

   
Voila', another incident which has come just in time for the current French president to fill the mainstream media news, especially the TV screens of France, with his ubiquitous presence.   Tel Aviv and Washington seem to play their cards right. The timing is perfect. After the recent shooting of French parachutists is Montauban, now we have the new crime scene in Toulouse, with French children shot at a Jewish school.
   
Four weeks before the first round of the French presidential elections, Nicolas Sarkozy, best friend of the USA and Israel, gets the chance of lamenting Islamic "fundamentalism" in France, although the supposed culprit for the shootings has not even been captured yet.
   
But Sarkozy seems to be quite sure in advance that the man who shot in Montauban is the same who shot in Toulouse.
   
Sarkozy's publicly displayed grief for the Jewish victims gives him another possibility of commenting on anti-semitism in France and singing Israel's praise. Poor Israel, which is always threatened by the dangerous powers surrounding it, notably Syria and Iran.
   
Therefore Iran must be attacked as soon as possible, after the ousting of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad, which French secret services are currently trying to do.

Sarkozy's face, blown up "en toute grandeur", larger than life, beaming from a zillion photos, filling all the TV screens in France, what a wonderful possibility of getting some extra boost for the ailing, failing polls, all of it for free. It won't cost him a penny.
   
His favorite TV station, France 24, announces that "Nicolas Sarkozy is a politician who knows to follow the course of History," whatever that means. The French are masters of hollow bombast.
   
Some people whisper behind closed doors that the shootings in Montauban and Toulouse might be a minor 9/11, not planned and executed on such a grand scale, of course. But France is just a minor country, after all, when compared to Big Brother overseas.
   
CIA and MOSSAD come to mind, but nobody dares say it aloud. Speaking the truth may entail harmful consequences. The Europeans know that speaking up is risky. It is better to remain quiet if you want to be safe and keep your health intact.
   
The chase is on in Toulouse, the supposed culprit locked in his house, surrounded by police, and press people scurrying back and forth like scared mice, while Monsieur le President is ever-present, larger than life. He needn't even wear high heels to overcome his otherwise dwarflike stature.
   
Who profits from the crimes in Montauban and Toulouse? Honni soit qui mal y pense!
   
Defense Minister Longuet prepares the terrain, again on France 24: « Maybe we must watch more carefully all those coming from the exterior. » Which exterior? Syria or Israel? Iran or the USA?

At the ceremony for the victims of Montauban, Sarkozy rendered homage to the killed parachutists, presumably shot by the same man who shot the Jewish children in Toulouse.   
Sarkozy forgot to mention in his pompous speech at Montauban that the parachutists were of Muslim Arab origin, at the service of France and its neo-colonial wars against Muslim brothers and sisters abroad.
   
Journalist Cyril Vanier, on France 24, commented that "the coffins of the victims will be sent to their families." He did not mention that these are Arab families, Moslems living in France.
   
Of course it is not opportune to shout out loud that these Muslim parachutists lost their lives in France and for France, when the government of Sarkozy begins his electoral propaganda against Moslems. What a sinister farce!
   
Sarkozy instead drums about "defending the values of France", whatever those might be, nobody exactly knows, these days. He drums on about "France having received an international mandate". By whom? To do what?
   
We can only suppose that this mandate was given by Washington and Tel Aviv to first destroy Syria, later Iran. In this "international mandate" France will keep genociding Muslim nations, leading proxy wars for Israel.
   
If he loses the elections, Sarkozy has promised to withdraw from politics. Let's hope that some clever Jewish real estate agent will sell him a nice beach house in Israel. Sarkozy might want to take his wife Carla and baby what's-its-name to withdraw to his beloved Israel forever after. What a relief!


Prepared for publication by:
   
   
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 24/03/2012 @ 15:39
Amnesty and the NATO Cover-Up of War Crimes in Libya.
            
            
Posted on March 22, 2012   

   
By Christof Lehmann – nsnbc. Yesterday, on 19 March 2012, Amnesty International was calling on NATO to “investigate the killing of dozens of civilians during it`s air campaign last year and to provide reparations to the people affected”. Amnesty further stated that “adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to the victims and their families“. NATO rebutted Amnesty International`s call for an investigation and compensation for the “dozens” of civilians, and in doing so, NATO has entered an elegant propaganda dance macabre. A propaganda dance macabre, designed to dominate and more importantly direct the public and political discourse away from the true dimensions and proportions of the war crimes that were committed under NATO command as well as command responsibility.
   
The “human rights organization” that is branding itself as “watchdog”   is obviously attempting to make even well intended humanitarian minded members of the worlds public belief, that NATO`s Operation Unified Protector, authorized by UNSC Resolution 1973 has resulted in 55 documented cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women that were killed in air strikes in the capital Tripoli and the towns of Zliten, Majer, Sirte, and Brega. The amnesty narrative must make the heart of every NATO propaganda expert jump faster. Possibly, Amnesty is positioning itself for a Nobel Peace Price, where it would be in perfect company with Barak Hussein Obama, Henry Kissinger and other humanitarian avatars. After all, Amnesty International USA has Suzanne Nossel at the helm. A Hilary Clinton aide for International Organizations Affairs.
   
Reality Amnesty-Style is depended on the all important methodology. With the correct methodology it is possible to reduce a genocide to 55 documented cases – and viola   an amazed misinformed public donates to Amnesty`s pacers, pads them on their back asking them to “keep up the good work“.
   
For those who would like to leave the Orwellian Matrix one may remember the following.
   
The NATO led assault on Tripoli started with the firing of over 100 Cruise Missiles into the densely populated Tripoli alone. Now imagine 100 Cruise Missiles fired into the city of Paris, London, New York and the carnage they would unleash.Can anyone in his right mind imagine that 100 Cruise Missiles dropped on Paris would result in 55 death, including 16 children and 14 women ? Or was it more likely that there was something terribly flawed with Amnesty`s methodology. Having the habit of answering rhetorical questions I would say yes, something is terribly flawed about Amnesty`s methodology, and nobody will make me belief that a well financed, well staffed, international organization as Amnesty International is not aware of the fact. So why, Amnesty ? Why, Suzanne Nozzel ?
   
Right – it`s all about methodology. Those who are to intimidated to “report” the murder on their families to Al Qaeda mercenaries who roam the streets, raping, plundering and murdering don`t exist. And where you don`t look you can`t find anything. Statistic is a great tool – and Amnesty is apt at using it. The problem is, Amnesty has so good ties to the US Department of State and Main Stream Media that nobody who is asking all the right questions will get any air time or columns. Thus, tens of thousands disappear, and NATO can rejoice happily in it`s little public embarrassment about those 55 documented cases.
   
We may recall that the land assault on Tripoli – right, that one where Al Jazeera and other GCC and Western Media aired pictures of celebrating crowds on Tripoli`s Green Square, which later were proven to having been recorded in Doha, Qatar (1) – let`s recall that NATO`s bombing was strictly coordinated with the so called rebels, who committed atrocities from random arrests and summary executions to rape and systematic ethnic cleansing (2) – let`s recall that that assault was initiated from the sea side, from NATO vessels, and that NATO`s Apache Helicopter Gunships and Jets were strifing the streets with heavy machine gun fire and Hellfire Missiles to pave the way for the advancing heroes of the Libyan Revolution. First among those heroes, the NATO / MI6 Asset, known terrorist, and commander of the Al Qaeda associated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. (3) Yes – the one Belhadj who is now commanding 18.000 Al Qaeda / NATO mercenaries to liberate Syrians to death.
   
We may recall the fact that even the Colonial Lap Dog of the E.U., the African Union`s Fact Finding Mission and subsequently the Pan African Parliament complained not only about the AU`s failures, but about the wide spread massacres and killings of black African Libyans and migrant workers, and the fact that entire villages and towns were ethnically cleansed.(4) In Tawergha alone some 15.000 black Libyans are expected to having been massacred and the town that was previously populated by 20.000 people has literally ceased to exist.(5)
   
We may recall the NATO cluster bombs and Fuel Gas Explosion Bombs that NATO used against the citizens of Bani Walid.(6) Personally I personally recall a phone conversation with a Libyan medical doctor at the hospital in Sirte, reporting about hundreds of dead after just one NATO bombing raid and over 1000 dead within the last week.(7) NATO`s UN mandate according to UNSC resolution 1973 permitted one and only one military action, the enforcement of a so called “No Fly Zone” which was already sufficient to be a gross violation of the UN Charter and International Law. The enforcement of a no fly zone is always implemented by the bombing of a sovereign nations air force, radar and other military installations. NATO would not have had to have command responsibility for the murder of over 100.000 Libyans for having committed a gross violation of international law. Fact however is, that by deploying Special Forces who led the Libyan Al Qaeda Mercenaries under Belhadj, by importing foreign fighters from Mazar E-Sharif in Afghanistan (8), by coordinating NATO Special Forces operations with illegally deployed Qatari and Saudi troops who together with NATO attempted to bring some military raison into the headless assaults of the few Libyan fighters who actually fought at times other than for Al Jazeera appearances, NATO, and it`s political as well as military leadership took command responsibility upon them selves.   I could go on, but belief that I have made the point.
   
There is one word that is almost as terrifying for war criminals as the word “nationalize” is for globalist cartels. It is the word “command responsibility“, and according to international law, NATO and it`s political and military leadership has direct command responsibility for the murder of over 100.000 Libyans.
   
Who then, could be a better friend of NATO`s war criminals then, than a humanitarian “Watch Dog” who is telling the world about NATO`s horrendous crimes in 55 documented cases. 16 of them Children! 14 of them Women! How horrific, and someone should get a little slap over his little finger.
   
Methodology makes it possible.   You see, with the right methodology used, You don`t exist and if you don`t exist, you can be murdered with impunity.The root cause for the problem is systemic. There is in fact no organization that documents war crimes in a prosecutable manner, and especially civilians are, de facto, in a state of legal limbo. We the People can at best fool ourselves to having at least “some” sense of justice by arranging International War Crimes Tribunals with no other than Moral Authority. Now imagine a psychopathic murderer and tell him that you have just sentenced him for mass homicide, and that you morally condemn him. He`ll laugh you straight into your face, if you are lucky, murder you next if you are not so lucky, and that is exactly the effect of such war crimes tribunals. All respect for His Excellency Dr. Tun Mahatir Muhammad, but this is not the way to deal with war criminals. To make matters worse, even though Dr. Tun Mahatir Mohammad`s Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal was established with the best of intentions, such Tribunals are counter productive due to the fact that they give the public the impression that there exists at least “some” kind of Justice which in fact is utterly illusory.
   
There is one constant that is valid for all citizens, all over the world. It is that war criminals can murder, plunder and rape them, You, with absolute impunity unless “some” nation finds it “opportune” to take on their case; and, even if one is so luck to be instrumentalized in politicized tribunals non of them has any “right” to compensation of any kind, ever, unless the majority of the people world wide “demand” that laws and institutions are established that provide factual rights and factual protection. Such demands can only be enforced by an informed public that is aware of the fact that every single one of them can be murdered and raped with utter impunity. An informed public that organizes itself to the point of critical mass, making use of their best weapon – their money and their will to right and justice. Tribunals that give psychopathic murderers a slap over their little fingers in moral sentences are in fact almost as counter productive as highly politicized kangaroo courts and victors justice at the ICC . Some of the systemic problems are:
   
The International Criminal Court is a U.N. body. The United Nations was in the case of Libya a waring party due to the fact that it passed UNSC resolution 1973-2011 on Libya, authorizing NATO to act on it`s behalf. Any subsequent war crime investigation about any war crimes committed in Libya would make the ICC not impartial and impeachable. Some nations, like Spain, have implemented International Jurisdiction with respect to the most serious crimes recognized by mankind, including crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the crime of genocide, ethnic cleansing and other. Now imagine a citizen of Bani Walid or Brega, whose family has been decimated by NATO Cluster Bombs, whose house and business was devastated and ruined gather sufficient resources to plead to the State Prosecutor of Spain to take on his case.
   
The naked and saddening fact is, that You, I, and every citizen of this world is in fact without actual protection against war crimes by any law, or by any legal body, unless some nation is willing to take on the case; and, even if one should be so lucky to find the “mercy” of the one nation, NGO, or the other, who doubtlessly have their own motivations to engage in your case other than the fact that a crime has been committed, it is highly questionable that we will witness not politically biased kangaroo courts.   The Milosevic trial being but one prime example.
   
For the sake of humanity it would be high time to consider how to remedy the fact that all those who fall through the mesh of Amnesia International Style war crimes investigations can be murdered with impunity.
   
At closing, I wonder if Amnesty ever investigated how many Libyans were murdered alone during the one cluster bomb attack on the citizens of Brega shown on the video below. You tube continued deleting and removing it. Amnesia International has most likely forgotten that it ever existed. Methodology makes it possible.
   
NATO deploys Cluster Bombs over Densely Populated area of Brega / Libya.
   
   
Christof Lehmann      
      
20.03.2012      
      
nsnbc
   
=============================================================
   
1) Arabian Summer or NATO`s Fall. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/arabian-summer-or-nato%C2%B4s-fall/
   
2) The awful Truth of Libya. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/the-awfull-truth-of-libya/
   
3) Abdelhakim Belhadj, The Mask Behind the Many Men. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/abdelhakim-belhadj-the-mask-behind-the-many-men/
   
4) PAP blasts AU over Libya, covering it`s own Failures. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/pap-blasts-au-over-libya-covering-it%C2%B4s-own-fai lures/
   
5) Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide, and the Tawergha. Human Rights Investigations (2011) http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/ethnic-cleansing-genocide-and-the-tawergha/
   
6) International Military Support for Libya results in TNC withdrawals. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/international-military-support-for-libya-results-in -tnc-withdrawals/ NB.: The link to the video documenting cluster bombs has since been removed from YouTube. The video is shown above as part of the present article.
   
7) New Attack on Sirte at Closing of NATO Summit. Christof Lehmann (2011) nsnbc. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/new-attack-on-sirte-at-closing-of-nato-summit/
   
8) CIA recruits 1500 from Mazar-eSharif to fight in Libya. The Nation (2011) http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/31-Aug-201 1/CIA-recruits-1500-from-MazareSharif-to-fight-in-Libya
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 27/03/2012 @ 21:06
Was it possible to save Yugoslavia?
         
         
         
27.03.2012



March 24 marked the 13th anniversary 24 of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. Was it possible to prevent the bombing? Could Russia have saved the Serbs? The former Russian Prime Minister Evgeny Primakov, a participant of those events who has made a turn over the Atlantic, talked about it in an interview with Pravda.Ru.   

On March 24, 1999 NATO began bombing Yugoslavia. Its outcome was the virtual failure of the country, retraction of the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) from Kosovo and the subsequent de facto separation of the region from Serbia. Today, many in Russia say that the country has not helped the fellow Serbs and actually gave them at the mercy of the NATO war machine.

One of the highlights of those days was the famous "turn over the Atlantic" of the aircraft with Russian Prime Minister Evgeny Primakov on board. He was on his way to the United States for an official visit. However, when he was given the    information about the beginning of the bombardment, he turned the aircraft over the Atlantic Ocean and aimed back.

Why did he do this? Was there a chance to avert the bombing? Primakov talked about the events with the chair of the board of directors of "Pravda.Ru" Vadim Gorshenin:

"I do not think it was some feat. I made the decision myself. After that, Yeltsin called me and I told him that I took such a decision. He approved of it. If I had not done this, I would have done very wrong thing.

Al Gore told me directly: the decision to bomb has been made. I replied that he was making a huge historical mistake. (My phone call was made from the aircraft, he was then vice-president.) He asked me to sign a memorandum of understanding that the visit is postponed. I refused. He offered to land somewhere in the United States, I again refused.

If under those circumstances I would have landed and began my official visit, I would have been a traitor. There was no heroism there. I am sure that Vyacheslav Trubnikov (former head of the Foreign Intelligence Service. - Ed.), and Igor Ivanov (then head of the Russian Foreign Ministry. - Ed.) would have done the same thing. At that time it was impossible to prevent the bombing. "

Was there a chance to avert the war or change its course? Vadim Trukhachev, an observer with "Pravda.Ru" talked about this with historians Sergei Romanenko and Vladimir Putyatin.

Sergei Romanenko, an expert of the Center for Political Studies with the Institute of Economics of RAS:

"Slobodan Milosevic had a chance to avert the war. In this regard, Rambouillet comes to mind (the negotiations in Rambouillet near Paris between delegations of Yugoslavia and the Kosovo Albanians in early 1999. - Ed.). There are different assessments of the agreement, but in any case it was breached by the Serbian side. It seems that this was his last chance. Russia was also aware of this - although at the time there were several centers of foreign policy.

Kosovo Albanians should erect a monument to Milosevic as the founder of the Kosovo Albanian government in the center of Pristina. If it had not been for his policies and violent suppression of peaceful population, it seems that neither the U.S. nor the EU nor NATO would have paid attention to this issue. On the other hand, he acted according to his logic - political and psychological.

The disintegration of Yugoslavia and later events were unexpected for the world community. It (both in Russia and in the West) did not understand what problems Yugoslavia faced during its disintegration.

Could NATO avoid bombing? Of course, it could. While criticizing Milosevic, it should be noted that the West has chosen a dead-end option. The U.S., NATO, and the EU have reached an impasse and were putting out fires. A war always means death of innocent people. They do not care who kills them and why. These bombings were a gesture of helplessness and lack of understanding. "

Vladimir Putyatin, an expert on Yugoslavia at the History Department of Moscow State University:

"In December of 1998, Russia and Yugoslavia signed a protocol on military-technical cooperation. However, the main obstacle in the delivery of military equipment to Yugoslavia was the UN Security Council resolution banning the supply of any weapons there. Russia also voted for this resolution. From a military point of view, along with the supply of weapons - mostly air defense systems - Russia should have sent its military experts as the Army of Yugoslavia did not have such missile systems. In the event of a direct military conflict, it would have been able to provide decent resistance to NATO forces."

Military experts Alexander Khramchikhin and Konstantin Sivkov shared their opinions on Russia's ability to help Yugoslavia with a columnist of "Pravda.Ru" Sergei Balmasov.

Alexander Khramchikhin, deputy director of the Institute of Political and Military Analysis:

"I do not think that Russia had a chance to defend Yugoslavia. There would have been a real threat of starting a nuclear war with the United States. At one point Russia has destroyed itself, getting involved in in the First World War in 1914 because of the Serbs. For some reason the Serbs had never helped Russia. Milosevic has had a chance to avoid the war. In the West he was not considered a bloody dictator before the events in Kosovo. However, he missed the opportunity to solve the issue peacefully.

In addition, he committed treason, getting involved in this war, and having surrendered after the country was bombed. When this happened, a land operation was on the agenda. It would have been much more difficult for NATO. If the Yugoslav leader started fighting, then it should have been done until the end. Or, he should have just given up not to cause suffering to his people. "

Konstantin Sivkov, first vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Issues:

"Russia could have helped Yugoslavia if we had a sufficient number of S-300 with trained staff. Moreover, the Yugoslav army has not suffered defeat in this conflict. The damage from NATO air strikes was less than one percent of the population of Serbian troops. Sadly, Yugoslavia has lost because of Russia. Moscow put pressure on Milosevic to compel him to surrender. It happened at the time when he was to hold just a little longer. North Atlantic bloc under public pressure would have to cease operation. "



Vadim Trukhachev, Pravda.Ru   
   
   
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 30/03/2012 @ 10:28
Save France from the CIA, MOSSAD and Al Qaeda!
                     
                     
29.03.2012
   
   
By Olivia Kroth

One month before the presidential elections, France had its newest sensation, a western cowboy style film with the headline "greatest manhunt in history," showing Nicolas Sarkozy's tragically pale face with tightly shut lips and wrinkled forehead, worrying about the future of France.

His polls were down low lately because French voters judged his political performance as bad, worse, worst. So Sarkozy hung on to his cowboy film with the "greatest manhunt in history" script like a dead fly to the window grid. The blown-up story was his last hope of winning voters and augmenting his chance in the upcoming elections.

France is home to the largest Jewish community in Europe. Around 700,000 Jews reside in the country. The story of the shooting at a Jewish school came in handy for Sarkozy, but many French people have their doubts.

The online media, Alterinfo, brought several articles, asking about the truth of the story.

There was a lot of bang-boom, patati and patata around the building, with a whole squadron of RAID police running around the block day and night, police cars with sirens screeching, colorful carnival fireworks, plenty of press people and dumbfounded lookers-on.

But were the three Jewish school children really shot dead? If so, then why did their bodies not undergo autopsy, as is required by criminal law in France? The official information given was that after Jewish ritual, the burials had to take place within 48 hours.

Some readers in their comments on Alterinfo mused about the absence of dead bodies. Could it be that those allegedly shot children were in reality whisked away to Israel?   People know that Jews do not kill other Jews. They believe that this "shooting" was a MOSSAD hoax to enhance their buddy Sarkozy's chances in the election. It seems to be some sort of false flag operation, with dark forces trying to instill fear in French citizens.

If the alleged killer of the French Muslim parachutists in Montauban and the French Jewish children in Toulouse really belonged to the Al Qaeda network, then French voters have every right to ask Sarkozy why he supports Al Qaeda terrorists in Libya and in Syria, where French secret services are currently arming and training these terrorists to topple Bashar al-Assad's government.

Sarkozy's protection and support of Al Qaeda in Libya and Syria is like an invitation of Al Qaeda to France. The chickens always come home to roost.

The French people also asked why the "massive manhunt" was drawn-out so long, with endless reports, features, interviews and TV talk shows, before the young Frenchman of Algerian origin was finally liquidated by RAID policemen in his tiny apartment of 38 square metres.

Are the French police so incompetent that they are unable to capture a killer faster than that?

In Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, the French soldiers and secret service men work much faster, killing hundreds, even thousands of innocent people in the spur of a few minutes.

It was pathetic how Sarkozy's wrinkled face was shown again and again, keeping "a minute of silence" for the victims in France, because he is the one who produces non-stop victims in Afghanistan, Libya and Syria by sending French killers to these Muslim countries in order to silently genocide their populations.

According to Gavin Hewitt of BBC, Mohammed Merah (23) was trained and handled by the French secret service DCRI.   He had a passport with an entry stamp for Israel. What did this young Muslim do in Israel?

He also had the direct phone line number of a French secret service agent of DCRI, who probably was his personal handler and trainer. What did they talk about on the telephone?

Mohammed Merah was obviously on best terms with the French secret services before they decided to set him up and annihilate him.

Was he a sort of stupid little patsy, an Algerian sheep in the wool of a French wolf?

Formerly, he had allegedly received his training in the CIA base of Bagram in Afghanistan by the secret service organization DCHC.

The Pentagon and the CIA are known to specialize in the creation of Al Qaeda terrorists for world-wide use.

Since the times of entry into NATO, France seems to have degenerated into some sort of banana republic, with growing state debt, unemployment and a president who is involved in shady business, to put it mildly.

The times of such noble patriots as General Charles de Gaulle are long gone, alas.   Let's hope that France will find a new president soon, one who truly has French blood and honor in his veins, one who does not resort to all kinds of crooked shenanigans and endangers his citizens' lives in order to remain in power.

The French will not forget the latest coup d'état with which Sarkozy, together with his best friends from the CIA, MOSSAD and Al Qaeda, tried to pull the wool over his voters' eyes.

It is high time for him to leave France in peace.


Prepared for publication by:   
   
      
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 31/03/2012 @ 08:42
New challenge of Al-Qaeda to France


According to messages from Cairo, the North African Al-Qaeda, the ally of France in Libya and Syria, is ready to blow up some bombs in Paris on day of presidential election. Terrorists intend to teach a good lesson Frenchmen for a damage to Al-Qaeda cell in the south of France.

The French officers trained Al-Qaeda's fighters in the south of France according to the instruction of president Sarkozy. Nicola Sarkozy's French government, bypassing the international sanctions, gave to Al-Qaeda the modern weapon and supplied terrorists by the most modern explosive.

Today the Al-Qaeda's fighters who have got wounds in Libya and Syria, have treatment in the best hospitals of France.

The Al-Qaeda's fighters who have made huge fortunes by robberies in Libya, buy real estate in France and intend to create for itself favorable environment according to traditions of radical Islamism.

Thus Nicola Sarkozy made France hospitable for Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda stretched the network in all departments of France. Every day tens recruits strengthen Al-Qaeda in France.

Frenchmen should be are very grateful to Nicola Sarkozy for their safe future under a wing of Al-Qaeda of France!


 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 05/04/2012 @ 09:43
Sarkozy and the stink bombs
                     
                     
04.04.2012
   
   
By Olivia Kroth

The incumbent French president Sarkozy spoke of journalists throwing stink bombs at him, "bules puantes," in the Bettencourt affair, which reaches way back to the year 2007, when French billionaire Liliane Bettencourt (Oréal) secretly financed his election campaign, and which is dragged back into light now during Sarkozy's election campaign.

More stink bombs are coming his way in the recent affair of Toulouse-gate, which is developing into an international scandal, as Algerian lawyers are implicated now.

Ten advocates will represent Mohammed Merah's Algerian father in his lawsuit against the French police who assassinated his son, Iran's French radio IRIB reports. Seven Algerian and 3 French lawyers, one of them a prominent personality whose name is not given, have taken up the mandate, according to Madame Zahia Mokhtari, who is Mr. Merah's main lawyer in Algiers.

She says that she has demanded a visa for France at the Algerian Lawyers' Association which will transmit her request to the French Consulate in Algiers. "As soon as I receive my visa, I shall depart for France to start court proceedings against RAID in Paris," she explained at a press conference in Algiers.

Meanwhile police officials in France are getting cold feet. Claude Prouteau of GIGN, Intervention Group of the National Gendarmerie, said that RAID could easily have captured Mohammed Merah alive. He asked why they killed Merah in his apartment under a rainshower of 300 bullets, although Interior Minister, Claude Guéant, had affirmed that everything possible would be done to arrest Mohammed Merah alive.

Bernard Squarcini, head of the secret service DCRI, denies that Mohammed Merah worked for his agency, but eye witnesses say that one day before Mohammed Merah was assassinated, he had demanded to speak to his DCRI handling agent, a woman of Algerian descent.

Mohammed Merah's older brother Abdelkader(29), who has been detained so he will not speak to the press, flatly denies that his brother was the killer in Montauban and in Toulouse. He also says that he himself is not implicated in those incidents in any way.

Just like the bodies of those three Jewish school children, allegedly shot in Toulouse, Mohammed Merah's body never underwent autopsy, although this is a necessary procedure, required by the French criminal law.

Merah's lawyer in Algiers asks why the French authorities are not keeping to French law: Where is the forensic report? Where is the ballistic report? She demands both reports to be handed in by French authorities for the law suit in Paris.

Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between the official report and an eye witness report, regarding the identity of the killer of three French Muslim soldiers in Montauban. The authorities insist that is was Mohammed Merah who shot them, but a lady, who bumped into the murderer as he ran away from his deed, described him as a stout, corpulent Caucasian with blue eyes and a tattoo on his chin.

Mohammed Merah, however, was a slim Arab with brown eyes and no marks on his face at all. There are videos circulating on the internet, with the eye witness speaking. Merah's lawyer will probably ask this lady to be heard in court.

The French government has tried to prevent the court proceedings, but to no avail. Madame Mokhtari commented at the press conference in Algiers,"Mohammed Merah had French citizenship, he lived in France, was assassinated in France and buried in France. Everything happened in France. Consequently we are addressing our complaint to Justice in France." She expressed her astonishment at the French regime's futile attempts to prevent the proceedings.

A few weeks before the presidential elections in France, incumbent Sarkozy is walking around like a lame duck: after the catastrophe he provoked in Libya, the defeat of his secretive attempts to undermine Syria, now he has Toulouse-gate ante portas.

Above all, there is his inability of providing stable jobs, stable prices and decent social security to the French citizens who are angered by his "casse de la France," his break-up of the country.

Sarkozy wasted billions of Euros on bombing Libya, money he would better have used for the upkeep of infrastructure back home.

Furthermore he dissipated French taxpayers' money to pay for dissenters in Syria. According to Wikileaks, the FUKUS axis of France, the UK and the USA, spent 6 million dollars in 2007 alone to pay Syrian emigrants for raising hell in Syria. How many more millions were spent in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011? How many of those dear millions were chipped in by France?

The French taxpayers will never get to know the exact numbers, which might be better after all, lest they bombard Sarkozy with more foul eggs. On his last visit to Bayonne, a small border town between France and Spain, Sarkozy was booed, punched and pelted with eggs. He ran into a bar to save himself. Later he said that it was his rival Hollande from the Socialist Party who had organized the event.

We could laugh at this punch-and-judy show, if the shootings were not so tragic. It is high time for France to find peace again.


Prepared for publication by:   
   
      
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 05/04/2012 @ 09:59
Qatar sent the last fourth tranche for financing of election campaign of Nicola Sarkozy. The anti-terrorist operation advertized by the French police, has no relation to fight against terrorism. The young Muslims arrested by the French police in recent days how doesn't concern to Al-Qaeda.   

Meanwhile, France is the faithful ally of Al-Qaeda in the Middle East and in the Northern Africa. Al-Qaeda's Veterans feel the safety in Paris as no anywhere more in the world.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 07/04/2012 @ 07:44

Confession
               
               
Posted on April 6, 2012

I am an anti-semite: because I am telling the truth about the fact that Germany 2012 de facto is still under occupation; under administration by a government that is dependent on the Supreme Allied Command; Governed by a construct that is at best a Germany Ltd. while my compatriots are prevented from negotiating peace, because all who try to establish a true legal representation of Germany are denounced as Neo-Nazists.

I am an anti-semite: because I oppose the illegal occupation of Palestine, the daily war crimes, and the systematic genocide on the people of Palestine.

I am a terrorist: because I was not with Bush and his criminal wars on Afghanistan and Iraq, water-boarding, Guantanamo Bay, torture. I am a terrorist because I am calling the “war on terror” for what it is; a war of terror on the populations of Europe and Northern America; a pretext for waging terror wars on populations of sovereign nations that do not volunteer to be usurped or integrated into NATO´s hegemony.

I am a racist: because I don´t restrain myself from telling the truth about the fact that the first African American President of the United States of America, Barak Hussein Obama, was responsible for the genocide on the Tawergha and the massacres on tens of thousands of Black African migrant workers in Libya.

I am a self-hating white man: because I am appalled by the systematic re-colonization of Africa and the Greater Middle East by member states of the NATO Alliance.

I am dys-social: because I don´t endorse socialist parties who reduce mankind to an anonymous mass that subsists for the sake of the state.

I am a socialist: because I don`t endorse neo-conservatives, the criminal Chicago school of economics, Wall Streets and International Bankster´s usurping of entire populations and nations.

I am isolationist: because I don`t endorse the unholy alliance between International Banksters and the National Socialist International that survived WWII as extraterritorial state, the alliance that is normally known as   “The Bilderbergers”.

I am a heretic: because I am asking questions about how it is possible for a “monk” to keep his vows as a monk, the role of the Dalai Lama, while simultaneously fulfilling the office of king of Tibet in exile. I am a heretic because I find it appalling that a monk who claims to be the Saint of Compassion aligns himself with   secret services and one tyrannical government after the other, starting with Nazi Germany and Japan, ending with the USA. I am a heretic because I am telling the truth about the fact that Tibet under the rule of the Dalai lama was run by a clerical, corrupt aristocracy and theocracy, where human rights were trampled upon systematically, where an entire population lived in serfdom.

I am isolationist: because I oppose the creation of a one world government and the enslavement of the entire worlds population in a New World Order.

I am inhumane: because I don´t endorse organizations with humanitarian agendas, who lend themselves as pretext for waging humanitarian wars. I am inhumane because I oppose UN sanctioned wars under the pretext of humanitarian principles. I am inhumane because I oppose state sanctioned mass murder under the guise of protecting life.

I am a conspiracy theorist: because I am asking questions and demand answers about the events on 11 September 2001 and the “official conspiracy theory”, that 19 Muslims with box cutters brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 and flew another plane into the Pentagon. 19 Muslims, of whom many obviously still are alive.

I am an utopist: because I am demanding that governments, political and military leaders adhere to international laws that regulates warfare, torture, human rights by which they are bound.

I am paranoid: because I point out the massive use of main stream media for governments social control over populations; that the Pentagon invested heavily in the BBC; that Al-Jazeera and others produce false videos to justify illegal wars; that governments may read my e-mail correspondences, listen to my phone conversations, ran sake my home without warrant, all under the pretext of national security and terrorism.

I am a dangerous person: because I know the name of each and every member of parliament who voted for the illegal war on Yugoslavia, on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya; I know the names of each and every member of parliament who voted for laws that violate human rights and civil liberties. I am dangerous because I take my obligation as citizen serious, rather than taking it as a token, granted to me so I can feel that I have the right to take part in my countries politics, on one day every four or six years.

I am one of those against whom your government has to protect you: I know that all of my crimes make you feel terribly insecure and I am terribly sorry for having cause you so much fear and pain. Happily, your country can legally take action to protect you from myself and those like me; by Patriot Act´s, European Anti Terror Laws, the National Defense Authorization Act, FEMA CAMPS, secret prisons, extraordinary rendition, torture.

Be happy that your government can protect you from me and my likes, by arresting me without due cause; by holding me isolated, indefinitely, without the right to hear any charges that are brought against me; without the right to see any evidence; without the right to a lawyer, and if I am granted a lawyer, without the right that my lawyer may hear the charges brought against me and have insight into the evidence against me; without the right to a trial.

In the case that I become acutely dangerous, your government may protect you from me by murdering me – bullets are cheap, and I understand that keeping me indefinitely at a secret prison until the end of my natural life would strain the economy.

I know that I am a terrible person for all the crimes I am committing. I understand that all those laws really make you feel safe and protected, so that you can sleep well. Stay asleep.

Christof Lehmann      
         
06.04.2012
      
      
nsnbc
 
locked
СтартНазад [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ] ДалееКонец


@Mail.ru - counter Яндекс цитирования Рейтинг пермских сайтов

free counters