ru en
New Nuremberg for NATO crimes
Автор Тема Admin (26/10/2011 @ 21:39)
Заголовок : New Nuremberg for NATO crimes
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 30/05/2012 @ 18:16
President Francois Hollande managed to disappoint a considerable part of the Frenchmen who have given the voices to him. Critic of Blood-thirsty Nicola Sarkozy, Francois Hollande intends to spend 1,5 billion euro for war in Syria, having selected this money from people for whom he promised to create new workplaces.   
   
The president-socialist Francois Hollande is ready to bomb houses, hospitals, schools, without reflecting on victims and consequences of bombings of the Syrian cities and the subsequent military intervention.   
   
The Syrian refugees, escaping from NATO bombardments, for certain will flood Europe and even more will constrain the Frenchmen who have been very constrained by the Libyan refugees.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 08/06/2012 @ 17:13
Bullseye! Bugsplat! NATO slaughters 18 Afghan civilians
                                                      
                                                      
08.06.2012


NATO's "precision weaponry" is getting more accurate by the day. Eleven years after the Afghan campaign was launched to get...er....bin Laden, we have spectacular bugsplat attacks by drones against wedding parties. Bullseye! Today a child, tomorrow a terrorist, eh what?

The cowards flying drones from thousands of miles away call a successful strike (a murder) "bugsplat" as if the victim were no more than an insect. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Obama has increased such strikes exponentially; to save the lives of the boys back home in the US of A. Suppose we hold these cowards and murderers accountable? Who are they? Where are they? Who was flying the drone that murdered kids?

Does the USA care? Hell no of course not, but if someone were to drum up a nice lawsuit, imagine the number of stuffed shirts who would appear...

And on the ground? Well, yet again after over a decade has gone by, yet another Afghan family has to put its hand on its heart and sing God Bless America. This time it is the village of Sajawand where grandfathers, grandmothers, fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts and cousins carry their children slaughtered by NATO cowards from 30,000 feet. What were these children doing? Today a child, tomorrow a terrorist...is that it?

Why did NATO strafe the Libyan water supply and electricity grid and murder the grandchildren of Colonel Gaddafi in their home?

Logar Province, Afghanistan. NATO terrorist strike. 18 people murdered... five women, seven children, six men...in a "pre-dawn strike" (terrorist attack under cover of night) against "militants". What is a militant? Is it an activist that buys American weapons, or a terrorist that does not buy American weapons?

NATO has been speaking about its precision weaponry for over a decade, claiming that civilian casualties are kept to a minimum. Ten years on, it seems civilian casualties are a constant factor in any equation involving NATO. The bottom line is that sooner or later, these crimes will be accountable, and those who committed them or sanctioned them will be held accountable.

You cannot go out into the street and commit a murder just because you have a machine gun and nobody else on the street has.

In 2011 420 Afghan civilians were murdered by NATO or support troops. Is that acceptable?

                  
                     
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 27/06/2012 @ 16:40

NATO's Libya: A fine mess
                                    
                  
27.06.2012
   


The map is from June 25, 2012. The green flags show Jamahiriya-held areas, the flames show combats with the NATO-backed NTC terrorists, the rats show terrorist-controlled areas and the bombs denote NATO terrorist attacks against Libyan patriot forces defending their country from this scourge. Let us take a look at NATO's Libya.
   
At the beginning of 2011, Libya had the highest human development indices in Africa, one of its highest literacy rates, education was available to all for free, housing was provided to all for free, transportation was subsidised, food was distributed for free. Communities regulated themselves through the Jamahiriya system, self-governance through People's Congresses. These Congresses basically met and decided what they needed and the Government provided it.
   
Enter the FUKUS-Axis (France, UK, US) coveting Libya's vast sovereign fund, Libya's vast energy resources and standing against Colonel Gaddafi's vast humanitarian projects in Africa, for which he was to receive a special humanitarian prize from the UNO and which also denied the FUKUS Axis' banking, arms, telecoms and other business lobbies billions of dollars in revenue from loans made to corrupted officials across Africa.

Look at this second picture and you will see a young girl, allegedly beaten, tortured and raped by the FUKUS-backed terrorists. This is the scourge they have been backing. There are countless tales of torture, of decapitation, slicing breasts off women in the streets, murder, arson, looting, vandalism, theft, rape. This is what the FUKUS Axis and its leaders have done to Libya - they have turned a peace-loving and peaceful society, a fun-loving society into a land of terrified communities trying their best to fight off the terrorist scourge, trying to block it entering their towns and villages and cities to perpetrate the most shocking acts of butchery Africa has seen in a long time.
   
This is the legacy of Obama, Sarkozy, Cameron, Clinton, Juppe and Hague. Should they pay for it? Then why don't they?
   
Libya is a country in total chaos. This week: Four explosions rocked Tripoli, as the Libyan Resistance (patriots loyal to the Jamahiriya and against the NATO-backed Al-Qaeda terrorist rats) staged attacks against terrorist installations; Al-Qaeda terrorists in Benghazi cut oil supplies to western Libya (exacerbating the East-West divide).
   
There is news that Al-Qaeda elements are concentrated in the offshore Brak Shatty in a large agricultural project, southern Libya. The brother of Abo Yahia Alibi is with them. So where is the drone attack?
   
Al-Qaeda terrorists in Zintan have used mustard gas to murder people in Al Shqeqa, western Libya. So where is the drone attack?

Kufra: An ambush was launched by the Libyan Resistance against the NTC/Al-Qaeda/NATO terrorists by the Rijale Darf Hali Battallion. Many of these terrorist elements were liquidated in this operation.
   
Misratah: NTC/Al-Qaeda/NATO terrorist convoy has left the city heading to exterminate the Mchachiya tribe. Where are the drones?
   
Zawiyah: the NTC/Al-Qaeda/NATO terrorists murdered the lawyer Sadek Abderahmane. The terrorist group is called Haythem Khadraoui. Where are the drones?
   
Tobruk: Movement to divide Libya into Cyrenaica (Barqa), Fezzan and Tripolitania. Congratulations, Al-Qaeda/NTC/NATO...
   
NATO used chemical weapons in Libya: confirmed. Also, the quantity of bombs and missiles used by NATO in Libya is equal to 50 atomic bombs. Research: British Institute, study, Libya. In the following years Libyans will be born with disorders due to the radiation contained in these missiles and bombs.Environmental reports will be studied in the near future as to the future effects of these munitions on the subsoil and the environment, in which case under certain conditions, there is legislation to indict NATO and its leaders for war crimes under the Geneva Conventions.
   
Note: Is anyone with any sense of international justice interested in these reports? Where are those men and women who support the notion that international law exists to be upheld and not broken?   
         
         
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 09/08/2012 @ 18:17
Syria: Foreign-backed terrorists cause havoc in Healthcare Services
                                                         
                                                      
08.08.2012

The World Health Organization has released a report stating that Syria is facing critical shortages of medicines and pharmaceutical products. Since this was not the case before the scourge backed by the FUKUS Axis (France, UK, US) and its GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council), it is clear where the responsibility lies.

What to expect of regimes which masterminded the destruction of a peaceful country, Libya, which masterminded false flag operations, demonology and lies in the press, which masterminded the arming and training of terrorist groups such as LIFG on the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office's own list of proscribed groups - meaning in this case that William Hague and the FCO actually broke British law - groups which masterminded the unleashing of armed bands of psychopaths on Libyan society to murder, torture, rape, steal, loot and illegally detain people outside any due legal process?

What to expect of the same groups - FUKUS and the GCC - in Syria, where they have done exactly the same thing?

One of the results is clear for all to see. As their terrorist scourge, which is composed largely of 65,000 foreign, I repeat, FOREIGN, mercenaries, including many Libyans, lots of misfits from the GCC, Turks and of course FUKUS Axis operationals - paid cowards - is chased screaming out of Damascus and is surrounded in Aleppo, being confined to running around the countryside where its supply lines are being slashed daily and where its foreign masters are being caught, the tangible contribution they have made to Syria is visible.

This contribution to date has been death, destruction, the murder of Government authorities and security personnel in terrorist attacks with the connivance of the FUKUS/GCC Axis and now, a growing healthcare disaster. One imagines how they will pin this one on President Assad, himself a doctor who swore the Hippocratic oath to save lives, precisely what he is trying to do by defending his people against the western-backed terrorist filth.

Tarik Jasarevic, spokesperson for the WHO, declares "The recent escalation of clashes had resulted in substantial damages to the pharmaceutical plants located in rural Aleppo, Homs and Rural Damascus, where 90 per cent of the country's plants were located. Many of these plants had now closed down, thus resulting in a critical shortage of medicines."

Before this western-backed terrorist filth was unleashed upon Syria, the country produced 90 per cent of its own medicines. Once again, we see the hand of the lobbies which dictate policy around the White House and its poodle states at play, and they call this democracy.

"Democracy" for them is starting colour revolutions in sovereign nations whose geo-strategic position you envy or whose resources you covet, democracy is using terrorists to fulfil your goals, democracy is imposing a "Government" from the fringes of society after a colonialist meeting in a London Hotel and democracy is imposing a nice squeaky-clean western governmental package wherein you get to be ruled by a minority government, or whereby a government with 30% of the vote and the support of 23% of the population gets to impose its solutions to satisfy the cliques which have meanwhile closed around it. "Yes I know that was in your Manifesto but you aren't going to do it".

A true form of Democracy was the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, but then again those who understood what that was had to destroy it. In today's world, some democrats are less democratic than others. In today's world, people have been duped into voting for this farce, believing they are living in a democracy and not in a corporatist elitist society run by lobbies and cliques, which dictate economic and foreign policy. How democratic is NATO? Did anyone vote for it?

And then they have the cheek and the sheer, barefaced arrogance to label others who fight against terrorists "dictators". It seems that certain countries never learn...
                     
                        
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 21/10/2012 @ 21:38
The member of the Nobel committee as anonymity: The European Union was elected by the Nobel prize winner of the world for murder of Muammar al-Qaddafi, the leader of the Libyan Jamahiriya ....
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 01/11/2012 @ 16:24
The United States of America and other countries of NATO who placed bombers on they territory, who bombed Libya, who plundered over 200 billion dollars belonging to the Libyan people, who supported world terrorism and try to ruin the Syrian state, should be ready to new natural disasters, more destructive, than disasters early being. The United States will have new blow already soon, from the sky, this time.   
   
   
   
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 07/12/2012 @ 12:13
The Libyan chemical weapons, sarin and mustard gas, tested on inhabitants of the Libyan City of Bani Walid recently, is already delivered to the Turkish-Syrian border and can be used against the Syrian people by supervised NATO terrorist crews in the nearest future. The western diplomats and staff of the international organizations hastily leave Syria. The mass media supervised by Washington, already started preparing the world community for news: "The army of president Assad used the chemical weapon against the Syrian people".
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 03/01/2013 @ 20:23
Gaddafi millions: French judge hears shady details of Sarkozy's campaign funding


Published: 03 January, 2013, 06:56



Evidence has been promised to a French court that could prove former President Nicolas Sarkozy accepted more than €50 million in campaign donations from ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

­Information pointing to the existence of such documents was revealed late last year by Franco-Lebanese businessman Ziad Takieddine. He’s currently facing corruption charges and is under investigation over allegations of his involvement in a money laundering operation between France and the Middle East, in which he is believed to have been involved for 20 years.

I can provide you with details of the financing of Nicolas Sarkozy’s campaign,” Le Parisien quoted Takieddine as saying. He told the judge the sums involved would exceed €50 million, as Sarkozy’s 2006-7 campaign was “abundantly” financed by Tripoli. The payments continued after Sarkozy's victory, Takieddine added.

Takieddine’s testimony repeats allegations made by Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam and French investigative website Mediapart. Sarkozy has denounced the claims as “grotesque.”

He also claimed to be in possession of “evidence that three French companies in Libya have received contracts for fictitious services" to the tune of "more than €100 million."

At a December 19 hearing, Takieddine said a number of meetings to organize the payments had taken place in 2006 and 2007 between Claude Gueant, Sarkozy’s chief of staff, and Gaddafi’s private secretary, Bashir Saleh. He said records of these meetings were in the possession of former Libyan Prime Minister Al Baghdadi Mahmoudhi, who is living in exile in France.

Takieddine was apprehended while attempted to take cash out of Libya on a private flight in March 2011, during the NATO-led anti-Gaddafi campaign.

His trial centers on claims that a series of bombings in 2002 in Karachi, Pakistan, were carried out in revenge for the non-payment of bribes agreed during the 1994 sale of a French submarine. The tragedy killed 14 people, including 11 French naval engineers. Takieddine is charged with acting as an intermediary in the deal.

It is alleged that some of the cash involved was transferred back to former Prime Minister Edouard Balladur’s 1995 presidential election campaign. The activities also implicate Nicolas Sarkozy, who was Balladur’s campaign spokesman and budget minister.

If found to be true, the allegations could severely embarrass the former French president, as he together with UK Prime Minister David Cameron played a leading role in instigating the NATO airstrikes that helped topple Gaddafi in October 2011.


RT
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 08/01/2013 @ 20:34
The American president Barack Obama ran into debt to God of one his child because of Libya. The penalty heavenly is delayed, but not cancelled. Barack Obama will pay a tax for Syria also when the measure of his debt will be weighed.

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 21/03/2013 @ 14:52
FUKUS (France-UK-US): Neo-Imperialistic trash
                                                         
                                                      
21.03.2013


Why is it that France, from time to time, gets ideas above its station? Why is it that French Presidents, increasingly, start acting like failed Napoleons? Why is it that British Prime Ministers, while acting like war criminals, like to emulate the arch-war criminal, Churchill? Read on...

It is common knowledge that Napoleon, that French abomination who failed in his murderous attempt to spread French culture across Europe, liked to write letters to his lover, Josephine, asking her not to wash before they met so that he could smell the stench of her sweat, and...

In plain English, a dirty little... Frenchman. It is also common knowledge that every time a Frenchman gets ideas above his station, Germany teaches him his place. In plain English, French foreign policy is as effective as the Maginot Line. Bluster, bravado, BANG!!

He who turns and runs away, comes back to run another day.

And as regards Churchill, the war criminal of the First World War, hated by London taxi drivers because he was known as a stingy son of a bitch; he sent millions to their deaths in 1914-1918 through utter incompetence (Gallipoli), his speeches were oiled with champagne and brandy, his legacy was the disintegration of the British Empire which he claimed to support. I say...this here is ours, and that there is yours, eh what? Bring me a ruler to draw a nice straight line on a map...
   
And here we have François Hollande and David Cameron on yet another imperialist venture, this time trying to arm the Syrian terrorists who wish to murder men, women and children, impose Sharia law and kick Russia out of the Mediterranean, in return for greyish promises from Cameron and Hollande and their master across the seas.

And here we have the dynamic duo yet again, after they attempted to destroy the Jamahiriya in Libya, now threatening to "go it alone" after failing to convince their European Union peers to lift the arms embargo and provide the Syrian terrorists with weapons.

True, the Ministries of Defence in the UK and France will crow that they can provide tens of thousands of jobs and so wow, let's supply Indonesia with hundreds of millions of dollars of military hardware as they slaughter the Maubere population in East Timor. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it happened. It happened and was documented in this column...

François Hollande and David Cameron indeed emulate Napoleon and Churchill, Britain's version of everyone knows who... and like Napoleon and Churchill they both show a total disrespect for international law. You do not arm, aid and abet terrorists engaged in undermining the government of a sovereign state. It is illegal and it is proscribed as such under international law.

But then again, after Iraq, after Libya, who believes a word Paris and London say? And if they are not war criminals, then who is? But don't worry, The Hague ICC will never prosecute them... why, they are above the law, aren't they?

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 23/03/2013 @ 18:10
The beef meat containing the psychotropic weapon U6, was intended for the humanitarian aid of the European Union for Syria. But this poisoned meat got to a distribution network of Europe as a result of an oversight of the producer. The European officials hastened to call this beef as horse meat and declared its withdrawal from the European distribution network. But U6 managed to get into blood of Europeans and raised a wave of suicides and mental frustration.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 27/08/2013 @ 13:27
Syria: The questions that must be answered before any aggression
                                                         
                                                      
26.08.2013

Below we pose several questions, the basis of this article, which intends to reveal the whole truth behind the issue of the Syrian civil war. These questions have been sent to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the US State Department. Their answers, if they have any, will be revealed to our readers.

Question 1: Why has the west been supporting Syrian terrorist forces for two years?

Question 2: Do you not entertain the notion that to solve the Syrian issue, it would suffice for the west to cease arming, financing and aiding the Syrian terrorist forces fighting President Assad?

Question 3: Are you, or are you not, aware that in supporting forces hostile to President Assad, you are also supporting sources loyal to al-Qaeda?

Question 4: Do you now admit that your respective authorities lied regarding the issue of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq? Should the answer be negative, then please inform us as to where these weapons are.

Question 5: Regarding the previous attacks with chemical and biological weapons (CBW) in Syria, by the rebels you support, and confirmed by the UNO's Carla del Ponte, what are your comments?

Question 6: Under international law it is illegal to take sides in an internal conflict. How do you justify your actions in a. Libya and b. Syria in this context?

Question 7: The following accusation was sent to the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
   
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/06-11-2011/119534-indictment_nato-0/

Why did it not receive the courtesy of a reply?

Question 8: Under what authority does British Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary William Hague state/insinuate that the Government of President Assad was responsible for the recent chemical attack in rural Damascus, without an iota of evidence?

Question 9: Why were the videos of the so-called "chemical attack" uploaded to the Internet before the so-called "chemical attack" took place?

Question 10: Did you or your services know that the said "chemical attack" was going to take place beforehand? If negative, then how would you respond to the following evidence? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUW_oFufU-Y

Question 11: What is your response to evidence that such weaponry was fired from rebel-held areas using improvised missile technology?

Question 12: Do you deny that your special forces are involved in the field in Syria and if the answer is negative how would you respond to images providing evidence that such persons had been captured? Would you also deny that such personnel would have been able to provide to the terrorists the possibility of delivering such weaponry?

Question 13: Why did your leadership commit a mission creep in Libya which breached the terms of the UNSC Resolutions 1970 and 1973 (2011)?

Question 14: Are you aware that due to the American, French and British governments' successive lies in the last two decades, due to your continued war crimes and crimes against humanity, due to your illegal and unethical foreign policy, NATO in general and the FUKUS Axis (France-UK-US) in particular, have lost any moral high ground they once claimed?

Question 15: Why do you not explain to your citizens that President Assad has the support of the vast majority of the population of his country and would you please draw up a list of the popularity ratings of the 30-odd terrorist/opposition groups fighting against the State?

Question 16: If groups of armed terrorists took up weapons against the authorities in your countries, what would you do? Remember what Cameron said after the August 2011 riots in London? "WHEN IT COMES TO RIOTS, HUMAN RIGHTS GO OUT OF THE WINDOW." Imagine what he would do with thousands of armed terrorists running amok, slicing the heads off children and the breasts off women.

Question 17: What do you have to say about the murder of several thousand Syrian police officers and army personnel by the terrorists you support? Do you therefore agree that your own security personnel are legitimate targets?

Question 18: Back to Syria and the claims that the Government of President Assad was responsible for the "chemical attacks" what do you have to say in response to the following article?

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/doctors-behind-syrian-chemical-weapons.html

Question 19: Given the previous attacks with chemical weapons by the terrorist forces you support, do you honestly believe that anyone is going to believe your allegations that President Assad, a doctor, is going to deploy such weaponry on the outskirts of his capital city the same day the UN weapons inspectors arrive to ascertain the facts about previous attacks (by your terrorists)? Do you seriously think he is that stupid?

Question 20: Has anyone in a position of authority in your countries issued the courtesy of an apology for the murder of the Gaddafy grandchildren in 2011 and the lynching of Libya's sovereign leader at the hands of NATO backed terrorists?

Question 21: There are allegations that SOF teams are already on the ground in Syria on recce missions and programmes to train terrorists to attack the Syrian authorities. What is your comment?

Question 22: Do you deny that senior military and political personnel in the United States of America and the United Kingdom are aware of the active campaign by NATO forces in Syria to commit assassination attacks, to break the back of the Alawite forces and to carry out terrorist activity?

Question 23: What is your answer to this evidence that the USA and the UK were indeed behind the recent chemical attack in Syria?

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/cached-copy-of-scrubbed-article-confirm ing-us-and-uk-backed-chemical-weapons-in-syria/

Question 24: At Nuremberg, the United States and Britain pressed the prosecution of Nazi leaders for planning and initiating aggressive war. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the head of the American prosecution staff, asserted "that launching a war of aggression is a crime and that no political or economic situation can justify it." He also declared that "if certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us." What is your response?

Question 25: On the issue of chemical weapons, why did the forces you integrated deploy Depleted Uranium in several theatres of war and this being the case does this not render you guilty of using chemical weaponry against civilians? In case you are considering stating that DU is not a chemical weapon then how would you reply to this excerpt from Page 101 of the June 1995 paper June 1995 "Health and Environmental Consequences of Depleted Uranium Use in the US Army", (US) Army Environmental Policy Unit:

"If DU enters the body it has the potential to generate significant medical consequences. The risks associated with DU are both chemical and radiological." ?

Question 26: Remember this? "We're going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran" - General Wesley Clark. Retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied

Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia

Oh and Question 27: Is it true that Israel has granted GENIE ENERGY exploration rights for shale gas inside Syrian territory, major shareholders of this company being Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild?

Felicity Arbuthnot

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 30/08/2013 @ 16:17
Return the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama! UN Inspectors: We are watching you!
                                                         
                                                         
29.08.2013

As some sickening and sycophantic media reports begin the day with sniveling and groveling titles such as "The world is waiting for Obama", some home truths: The world is watching Obama, the world is watching Cameron, the world is watching NATO and the UN team and something dark is lunging behind its eyes.

In the United Kingdom, e-mails are this very day circulating as to how to start a movement de-selecting Members of Parliament who vote in favour of wars without consulting their constituents. After all, they say the system is democratic, and as it is, how democratic is a system which kowtows to the whims and caprices of the lobbies which control Washington, which use London as their bedboy? And how "patriotic" are British Prime Ministers from both sides of the party divide involving their nation in war after war after war which has nothing to do with Britain, destroying countries, murdering civilians and committing war crimes just so that Washington can (reluctantly) talk of "a special relationship" from time to time and London can sigh romantically kidding itself that its rogue colony will one day come back to mommy and join the Commonwealth?
   
The list is staggering: in the last five Premierships (Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown and Cameron, three Conservative and two Labour), the United Kingdom has involved itself in no less than ten wars: Lebanon, the first Gulf War (Iraq), the Bosnian War, Operation Desert Fox (Iraq), Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Iraq (again), Libya and now, Syria, none of which have anything whatsoever to do with Britain or the British people.

The sickening and disgusting jump-the-gun, lying, dishonest and totally misleading, sinister and manipulative policy spun by the FUKUS Axis (France-UK.US) today is exactly the same as 2003 in Iraq: "he has WMD because we say so and we know where they are, so we are going in anyway". Under international law, each and every use of military force has to go through a separate vote at the UNSC. The USA signed this document, the UK signed this document, France signed this document. Under the US Constitution, the President has to ask Congress for permission to engage the armed forces in cases which do not specifically pose a threat to the USA. If these laws are breached, the perpetrators are criminals and must be impeached and brought before a court of law.
          
Fast forward a decade, and they are adopting the same failed and idiotic policy, this time following the argument that Obama said there was a red line drawn at use of chemical weapons so if they were used, then he has to do something to not appear weak. But that is only one side of the coin, the other being who deployed them. Without a thorough investigation from the UN weapons team, not only investigating whether the weapons were used by more importantly, by whom, how can Messrs. Hague, Cameron and the Nobel Peace Prizewinner Obama state that there is an urgent need for military action?

And after Libya and their spectacular mission creep, who would believe a word they say these days?

On the subject of chemical weapons, the first deployment of these was from NATO in Iraq, the charge led by the Anglo-Saxonic dynamic duo, the United States of America and the United Kingdom, the Batman and Robin of the international scene after Y2K for all the worst reasons, with their depleted uranium weaponry, which will leave swathes of territory contaminated for several billions of years. This is a war crime, DU is chemical weaponry. And who is investigating what happened? Who is investigating the hundreds of thousands of deaths and deformities they caused?

Finally, the final word rests with a United Nations team which has conducted hurried investigations, will reach at a hurried and hasty conclusion and will deliver it on Saturday. Will they say what they really found, will they give us the truth, the whole truth and nothing but, or have their email accounts been tampered with, will they do as they are told and will we only know the truth thirty years hence from the opening of official secrets files?

I have every reason to suspect than unless a further mandate is given for a proper team to conduct a proper investigation, given the proper time to arrive at objective conclusions without the outside pressure of those who have already spent hundreds of millions of dollars positioning their weaponry into place, the coming days will stage a predicable end to this tragedy unfolding before our eyes.

But we are also watching the UN inspection team and a thorough investigation will be carried out as to their conclusions, who said what, when and why, let there be no mistake about it.

The truth will come out, the people will not be fooled. Whatever the outcome of the report, the eyes of the world are on Obama, and Cameron, and Hollande and the warmongers in their Governments controlled by Washington's lobbies. British Members of Parliament will be deselected and Obama will go down in history as the man who insulted the Nobel Institution to its very core, Cameron and Hague will go down in the annals of history as another two political poodles trotting along obediently behind their master and Hollande as another wannabe Napoleon climbing into bed with any passing Anglo-Saxon.

What a sickening political epitaph to bear for the rest of their cringing, sniveling days on this planet. So, Mr. Nobel Peace Prizewinner and your friends, how many civilians are you going to slaughter this time? Do you hear the screams of the children as they lie frying in their own skins after NATO has precision-bombed their home, a command and control centre? Or was it "to break their backs", eh what?

Oh! And a quote from Obama, 2007: "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

But that was before the, er...Nobel Peace Prize and anyway, what "Man" keeps his word these days in Washington, London and Paris?

Below, a video showing Syrian terrorists loading a gas canister onto a makeshift artillery unit, as they perpetrate a chemical weapons attack against Government forces. Obama, Cameron and Hollande...one with his eyes covered, the other with his hands over his ears and the other...

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-shows-rebels-launching-gas-attack-in-syria/

Idea for caption of UN report on said video: "This clearly shows a soccer field with a team of kangaroos playing against another team of Tasmanian Devils, but without a ball". It would be funny if we were not speaking about the point which humankind has reached, 2013. Obama, Cameron, Hollande, thanks for your (hideous) contribution.

                        
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 31/08/2013 @ 15:16
Obama should be deprived of Nobel Peace Prize, if USA strikes Syria
                                       
                     
30.08.2013


up_immagini/obamanobel.jpg


American President Barack Obama received a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people."

The head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Alexei Pushkov suggested U.S. President Barack Obama should be deprived of the Nobel Peace Prize in the event the Americans strike a military blow on Syria, he wrote on Twitter on Friday, August 30.

"If the United States strike Syria without a sanction from the UN, the world community must demand the Nobel committee should deprive Obama of the Peace Prize," he wrote.

It is worthy of note that U.S. leader Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people."

Previously, the draft resolution providing for the use of force against Syria had not been approved at the UN Security Council: Russia and China did not support the document.

In addition, the British Parliament opposed the country's participation in the military operation against Syria. The draft resolution from the government received the support from 272 deputies, 285 voted against it.

Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 02/09/2013 @ 11:10
Obama's choice
   

up_immagini/obamanobel.jpg                                                       
                                                      
01.09.2013

The choice is perfectly simple: President Barack Obama will show he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, or else insult it and all its long list of proud holders, tarnishing the Nobel Institution, spitting in the face of humankind, disrespecting the will of his people, who are today in syntony with the hearts and minds of the international community.

If Barack Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, he is intelligent enough to have accepted it knowing that it came with a tacit agreement that Washington would turn away from a bloodthirsty and failed policy of trying to import democracy from 30,000 feet, strafing civilian structures with military hardware, murdering men, women and children indiscriminately, destroying electricity grids, water supply networks, attacking schools, hospitals and children's homes with "precision weaponry".

This policy has earned the United States of America the very worst reputation in the hearts and minds of the international community, a reputation which in the last decade has morphed into a seething, white-faced, clenched-fist hatred, translated into so many American travelers claiming to be Canadians when they travel abroad.
   
Since business and dollars and the bottom line are the only things that seem to hold any meaning for those who dictate US policy, then let us also point out that moves are under way to boycott US goods, and the companies which sell them, which will signify the loss of millions of jobs for US citizens, jobs placed on the line by the US Congress in the forthcoming days, should they decide to go it alone (with France tagging along behind like an obedient little poodle with a pink rinse and ribbons on its tail).

Let us be honest, if the British Parliament (fearing de-selection processes from the Members' Constituencies) voted against any military action in Syria (and this is a country whose last five Prime Ministers involved the country in eleven wars), it is a clear sign that the people of the world, informed by the social media and misinformed by the corporate media, this time have not allowed the wool to be pulled over their eyes.

President Obama is intelligent enough to understand that the Syrian civil war is raging because his government and those of Washington's poodle states in Europe have been arming terrorists and giving them the go-ahead to commit atrocities - against the Syrian Armed Forces, against the police, against the emergency services, ambulance drivers, firemen, against women, against the elderly, against children. How would American servicemen feel, how would their fire service or ambulance drivers feel, if someone armed terrorists to shoot them?

He also knows that his "rebels" or in plain English, Islamist terrorists, have used chemical weaponry before and he also knows that there is not a shred of evidence that the chemical weapons fired recently was the work of the Syrian Armed Forces, in fact everything indicated that it was not. The Russians and Syrians have insisted that the UN Inspectors research deeper and visit other sites which would have been incriminating but as we all know, Washington pay's the UN's bills, which is one reason why a real United Nations Organization should be out of the USA.

The final question is what any military action would achieve. Firstly, any military action performed outside the auspices of the UNSC without a separate Resolution is illegal under the Charter. The USA knows that, it signed the document, so this avenue would be further confirmation that one cannot believe a word Washington says because it cannot even abide by the agreements it signs. Secondly, the President has no right to sanction military action without approval by Congress unless the direct well-being of the USA is at immediate risk, and President Obama knows that; in fact he said as much in 2007. Therefore the responsibility lies with Congress, which is the Senate and House of Representatives and with the War Powers Resolution comes collective responsibility. However, without a second UNSC Resolution, the decision by Congress holds no water in international law governing the case.

What is at question here is not the cavalier and irresponsible way in which the President has conducted himself, leaving himself open by committing himself in public to "red lines" without understanding the complexities of the issues involved. While it would not be the first time the USA has launched military action to avoid undue embarrassment in the White House, we stand today in 2013, not the nineteenth century.

Military action without any evidence would be an act of criminal irresponsibility and would render those sanctioning such a policy liable (and let us be honest, would the Syrian Armed Forces launch a CBW attack in an area where their troops were massed - although the images of their soldiers in hospital were not shown on western TV - would they deploy such weaponry on the eve of the inspections, would they use these weapons in an area where they are winning, would professional soldiers use them against civilians?) Movements are under way to check which members of Congress voted which way and they will have to suffer the consequences. Suffice it to say that some nine per cent of the people of the USA are behind military action.

Secondly, what would a military strike achieve? Immediate hostility from the international community, a wave of economic activity involving boycott of US goods and any companies selling them, murder of innocent civilians - and Congress should be aware that human shields are pouring voluntarily into Syria, to link up with their Syrian brothers and sisters in an "over my dead body" campaign to stand outside possible targets.

The headlines the day after such a strike will be splattered across the social and even corporate media, showing Syrian women and children murdered by US and French cowards hiding 30,000 feet up in the sky or behind some button a thousand miles away.

Thirdly, military action would send shockwaves round the international community, steeling the nerves of the people of this world against the USA and France, a coalition of two, underlining the increasing isolation of the United States of America. Was this what President Obama promised?

Finally, if President Obama deserved his Nobel Peace Prize he would make diplomacy work, as the Russians have been trying to do while Washington supports Islamist terrorists. It is not about sitting back and watching people get slaughtered, it is about not taking sides in an internal conflict, which means calling for a unilateral ceasefire involving all parties, it means allowing the Syrian authorities to defend themselves and the population against the atrocities committed by western-backed terrorists, it involves an objective policy which entertains the notion that the Syrian "opposition" are not little darlings and are perfectly capable of having used CBW to incriminate the Government, something we all know to be the case.

The decision remains with Congress. We, the social media, will be watching and waiting and we will see who votes for what. When President Obama came to power I defended him in numerous editorials, against the howls of derision from those who claimed I did not know what I was talking about. Let us see whether I was right, or whether they were. Should this be the case, President Obama at least have the decency to hand back your Nobel Peace Prize before I admit in public that I was wrong.

If this is about looking tough, you will appear as a far stronger leader by not deploying military force and by proving your worth through diplomacy. Here, yes, your epitaph will be positive. If not, you are intelligent enough to know that you will go down in history as a fraud whose Presidency was synonymous with supporting terrorists to satisfy the lobbies which pull your strings, perhaps the most disgusting and revolting epitaph of anyone to have ever held office in the White House.
                  
                        
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 05/09/2013 @ 14:00
U.S. Military Intelligence Involved in Chemical Attack in Syria


http://www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH260/1-3960-0d60f.jpg
A photo taken by Marco di Lauro/AP in Iraq in 2003 was present by US State Secretary Kerry on August 30, 2013 as evidence of the ’Assad’s chemical attack’.



The situation in Syria is still in focus of the world media. Another U.S.-led “humanitarian intervention” may be unleashed soon. The Pentagon announced that it is ready to attack Syria in order to punish Bashar al-Assad and Syrian army for the alleged use of chemical weapons against the civilians.

Meanwhile, the new evidence of the U.S. intelligence being involved in chemical attack near Damascus on August 21, 2013 has been leaked to Internet.

A hacker got access to the U.S. intelligence correspondence and published private emails of Col. Anthony J. Macdonald, who is the General Staff Director, Operations and Plans Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence the US Army Staff.

In an email exchange on August 22, 2013 with the US Army civilian analyst Eugene P. Furst congratulates Col. on successful operation and refers him to a Washington Post publication about chemical attack in Syria.

http://www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH271/1-3962-ea0a5.jpg


E.FURST: By the way, saw your latest success, my congratulations. Good job.

A.MACDONALD: As you see, I’m far from this now, but I know our guys did their best.


Another set of private correspondence between his wife Jeniffer MacDonald and Mary Shapiro reveals that colonel did not keep his mouth shut in the bedroom:

http://www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH309/1-3961-122bf.jpg


M.SHAPIRO: I can’t stop thinking about that terrible gas attack in Syria now. Did you see those kids? I was really crying- They were poisoned, they died. When is it over? I see their faces when in sleep. What did Tony say you about this?

J.MACDONALD: I saw it too and got afraid very much. But Tony comforted me. He said the kids weren’t hurt, it was done for cameras. So you don’t worry, my dear.

M.SHAPIRO: I’m still thinking about those Syrian kids. Thanks God, they are alive. I hope they got a kind of present or some cash.


From Col. MacDonalds’s wife dialog with her friend it’s clear that the video with the children killed in the chemical attack near Damascus was staged by the U.S. Military Intelligence.

This information sheds new light on the US administration’s confession that “there were indications three days prior that an attack [on August 21] was coming”.

As Joseff Budansky from GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs wrote on Sunday:

On August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major and irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and representatives of Qatari, Turkish, and US Intelligence [“Mukhabarat Amriki”] took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors. Very senior opposition commanders who had arrived from Istanbul briefed the regional commanders of an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development” which would, in turn, lead to a US-led bombing of Syria.

According to the same source,

On August 24, 2013, Syrian Commando forces acted on intelligence about the possible perpetrators of the chemical attack and raided a cluster of rebel tunnels in the Damascus suburb of Jobar. Canisters of toxic material were hit in the fierce fire-fight as several Syrian soldiers suffered from suffocation and “some of the injured are in a critical condition”.

The Commando eventually seized an opposition warehouse containing barrels full of chemicals required for mixing “kitchen sarin”, laboratory equipment, as well as a large number of protective masks. The Syrian Commando also captured several improvised explosive devices, RPG rounds, and mortar shells. The same day, at least four Hizballah fighters operating in Damascus near Ghouta were hit by chemical agents at the very same time the Syrian Commando unit was hit while searching a group of rebel tunnels in Jobar. Both the Syrian and the Hizballah forces were acting on intelligence information about the real perpetrators of the chemical attack.


The samples of toxic agents were reportedly sent to Moscow for a detailed analysis.

Published data clearly indicate that the US administration is about to create any pretext to launch a military strike on Syria. Most recent revelation that the US Secretary of State John Kerry has used a photo taken in Iraq in 2003 to illustrate “Syrian victims of gas attack” last Friday to justify his bellicous message to the US Congressmen gives even more evidence that the “intelligence information” the warmongers claim to be based on is groundless or simply fabricated.

Now the vast majority of people worldwide perfectly understand that a kind of tricky game is being played on their behalf. The British parliament has already met the demand of clearly expressed public opinion and opposed the suicidal war over Mediterranean. Will the US legislators show us the same prudence and common sense? We will see it next week.

Source   
Oriental Review (Russia)



Voltaire Network
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 06/09/2013 @ 13:13
Head of St. Jacob Monastery: Photos circulated on CWs use in Damascus suburbs fabricated



Posted on September 5, 2013 by Alexandra Valiente


Head of St. Jacob Monastery Mother Agnes Mary of the Cross said that what Syria is going through is a manifestation of a barbaric culture as ”kidnapping, killings and rape are daily recurrences in the gunmen-held areas.”

”What happened in eastern Ghouta in Damascus countryside is a crime against humanity that violates all international conventions,” Mother Agnes told RT Channel Thursday, calling on the international community to stand united against these violations.

”There have been pre-fabricated photos in the case of chemical weapons’ use that seek to incriminate the Syrian government,” Mother Agnes pointed out. ”There have been selected photos for children after the chemical incident without their parents appearing in the photos.”

”Syria’s enemies have persisted for two years and a half in fabricating news and jeopardizing peoples and civil peace in Syria,” Mother Agnes said. ”We’ve seen what happened in Iraq and Syria, and we won’t be fooled by another pretext to strike Syria.”

Mother Agnes pointed out that the videotapes circulated by media are part of a pre-planned scenario to incriminate Syria, adding she is preparing a report on the study she conducted in the issue which she intends to hand to the Human Rights Committee in Geneva.

Mother Agnes slammed the international community’s disregard for the crimes of the terrorist atrocities in Lattakia in August which left hundreds of people dead, expressing regret over the descent of morals in the international community.

The Syrian government has granted the UN investigation team entry to areas in Damascus countryside to probe chemical weapons use allegations, while the US and other countries rushed to point an accusing finger at the Syrian government without waiting the investigations’ results.

Damascus, (SANA)

syria360.wordpress.com
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 09/09/2013 @ 15:12
Identification of the dead children in Ghouta
   

http://www.voltairenet.org/local/cache-vignettes/L400xH250/arton180130-2ece7.jpg
   
   
Following the broadcasting of the images of the massacre in Ghouta, distributed by the Free Syrian Army and relayed by US and French services, Alawite families from Latakia have filed a complaint for murder.   
   
Some of these videos were filmed and posted on Youtube before the events they picture [1].   
   
They show children suffocating from a chemical intoxication that can’t possibly be sarin gas (the latter provokes yellow drool, not white drool).   
   
The children do not correspond to a sample of the population: they are all almost of the same age and have light hair. They are not accompanied by their grieving families.   
   
They are in fact children who were abducted by jihadists two weeks before in Alawite villages in the surroundings of Latakia, 200km away from Ghouta.   
   
Contrary to the sayings of the Free Syrian Army and the Western services, the only identified victims of the Ghouta massacre are those belonging to families that support the Syrian government. In the videos, the individuals that show outrage against the ’’crimes of Bashar el-Assad’’ are in reality their killers.   
   
[1] About the videos of the August 21st massacre, Voltaire Network, August 30th 2013.   
   
   
Voltaire Network


Thus the cynical and brutal provocation as a pretext for war is considered proved. Now the High International Court of Justice in The Hague should immediately begin an investigation to identify and punish the masterminds and perpetrators of serious crimes against humanity.
 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 09/09/2013 @ 17:17
up_immagini/obamahitler.jpg

The animal shape of the American fascists appears everything more distinctly in process of identification of the new facts testifying to horrors of chemical provocation, arranged by request of the White House. Bloody Barack Obama didn't regret one hundred children kidnapped in Alawites families to present their agonal torments on video for persuasiveness of his arguments in favor of war. Between Hitler in 1938 and Barack Obama in 2013 a difference only that Hitler did not kill the children for his provocations...

 
locked
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 11/09/2013 @ 16:56
Russia Duma speaker doubts US’s ‘second sight’ as it foretold Syria chemical attack


The Obama administration knew of the upcoming chemical weapons attack in Syria as it made its notorious “red line” threat, a Russian parliamentary speaker claimed on Tuesday.

Speaking at the opening of the first autumn session in Russia’s lower house, Speaker Sergei Naryshkin reminded MPs of President Obama’s “red line” declaration, where he cautioned the Assad government of military action if it crossed the red line, which was the use of chemical weapons.

Mr. Naryshkin underscored that the warning came shortly before the alleged use of nerve gas sarin on Syrian civilians. “I just can’t get rid of this feeling that they knew for sure that chemical weapons would be used in Syria.”

The Duma Speaker also accused the US of scorning fundamental norms and added that “international law means the world to us and our partners, members of foreign parliaments, who do everything in their power to endorse international security, and not to undermine it.”

Voice of Russia


 
locked
СтартНазад [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ] ДалееКонец


@Mail.ru - counter Яндекс цитирования Рейтинг пермских сайтов

free counters