ru en
Nuclear war on the horizon
Автор Тема Admin (02/12/2011 @ 18:18)
Заголовок : Nuclear war on the horizon
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 17/02/2012 @ 13:42
The third world war will be untied by the USA in this summer
            

Russian general: strike against Iran planned for summer


         
17.02.2012



Prensa Latina

An attack on Iran might happen in the summer, the Chief of Staff of Russian Army General Nikolai Makarov, warned today on the channel Russia Today. When referring to the tensions created around the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, Makarov noted that the West, especially the military in Washington and Tel Aviv, are preparing an act of war against the Persian country in April or no later than June this year.

The argument used for aggression, which Tehran considers artificially made to justify a war, refers to the alleged Iranian attempt to develop a nuclear program with military pretensions.

But Iran defends its right to use atomic energy for peaceful purposes and to produce fuel for its nuclear facilities.

The West reacts with bellicosity and more unilateral sanctions against the Persian state each time it refers to new programs to develop the atomic sphere and to reiterate its peaceful character, the source warned.

Makarov reiterated that Iran was the target of cyber attacks, while many of its scientists were victims of fatal attacks, whose authorship Tehran attaches to Israeli intelligence.

The Iranian authorities captured an unmanned U.S. spy plane, cited the Russian high command.

Moreover, the United States maintains a large concentration of naval forces in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, while Tel Aviv now accuses Iran of being behind the alleged attempts to organize attacks on Israeli embassies in Tbilisi and New Delhi.

The Russian military considered that the outbreak of a conflict with Iran could spread through the Middle East with a domino effect and unpredictable consequences, with the possibility of becoming even in an international confrontation.
   
      
Source: Prensa Latina   
      
Translated from the Portuguese version by:   
      
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 17/02/2012 @ 16:18
The Qatar emir finances terrorist violence in Syria
               
   
Russia confirms foreign invasion of Syria

Syria denounces countries in the region supporting terrorist violence
   

   
up_immagini/qataremir.jpg
            
16.02.2012


Syria denounced before international organizations the countries in the region that are behind the double "terrible terrorist attack in Aleppo that was perpetrated in an unjust campaign against the Syrian people," according to a statement of the Syrian Foreign Ministry.
   
The Syrian Foreign Ministry sent a letter of condemnation to the secretaries general of the UN, the Arab League, the UN Council on Human Rights and the Organization of Islamic Countries, the text of which was published in the press here today.
   
The message emphasizes that the two deadly suicide attacks with car bombs were directed at the security headquarters in residential areas, one near a children's playground and the other near a food establishment, causing many civilian casualties, as well as among members of law enforcement.
   
The powerful attacks on the morning of the 10th left a total of 28 dead and 235 wounded, but the fatal figure can rise because 14 of the survivors were in serious condition. Four bags of human remains have not yet been identified.

The Foreign Ministry denounced that "this horrible attack is part of the unjust campaign launched against Syria, which is supported by some countries in the region and instigated by various entities that support terrorist groups and armed gangs who kill innocent civilians, destroy the infrastructure, trains, buses, schools, pipelines and public and private properties."
   
The Foreign Ministry emphasized that the "crime was committed by parties that are supported by Arab and Western countries in violation of their international obligations and with the determination to undermine the security of Syria and its citizens."
   
It seems that some countries in the region encourage an international mobilization against Syria under the guise of humanitarian arguments, while they are harboring armed terrorist groups who choose to murder as a means to achieve their destructive goals.
   
In their note, the Government "demands that those who give refuge, support, funding and arms to these terrorist groups extradite these criminals according to international law and resolutions on the fight against terrorism."
   
The note also points to the countries and media that provide political and propaganda coverage to these terrorists to stop such practices, according to the resolutions of the UN Security Council.
   
Syria has been receiving demonstrations of support and condemnation of terrorist violence, particularly against the suicide bombings in Aleppo.
   
Deputy Russian Foreign Minister, Mikhail Bogdanov, confirmed on Friday the presence of British commandos and Qataris on the territory of Syria. It was made public after the Israeli digital website DEBKAfile broadcast such a possibility.

This same source said in December that Qatar and Saudi Arabia were subsidizing a terrorist struggle in Syria with the recruitment of mercenaries coming from Libya, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon and even added Chechen and extremist elements of Pashtuns from Afghanistan and Pakistan to these forces.
      
         
Source: Prensa Latina      
         
Translated from the Portuguese version by:      
         
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 23/02/2012 @ 13:21
Insatiable Israel putting on the squeeze again


            
23.02.2012


Israel has proposed new sanctions against Iran In another act of provocation. The Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Barak, on Sunday (19th) insisted that the so-called international community intensify the sanctions on Iran.
   
The Zionist leader thinks that Iran will transform the region into an immunity zone. And he pontificated that: "We must accelerate the imposition of sanctions."
   
Since 2010, Iran has been subject to stringent economic, trade and financial sanctions because the imperialist powers and Israeli Zionists suspect Iran's nuclear program is aimed at producing atomic weapons. But Iranian officials deny the accusations and say they are poisoned from bad political intentions.
   
"The international community must compel the Iranians to ask: 'Are we ready to pay the price of isolation or must we end our nuclear efforts?'" said a threatening Ehud Barak.
   
Tensions between Israel and Iran have worsened over the last week, after a series of bomb attacks against Israeli diplomats in India, Bangkok and Georgia. Iranian officials have denied involvement in the attacks.
   
The Iranians have also raised suspicions about the actions of the Israeli Zionists. According to statements by Iranian authorities, it is suspected that several of the dead scientists in the country have been victims of coordinated actions by Israelis.
   
The Israeli government has an advanced nuclear program and has nuclear weapons, without the so-called international community saying anything about it.
   
Vermelho with agencies
      
         
Translated from the Portuguese version by:      
         
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 24/02/2012 @ 23:59
up_immagini/vitaly-churkin.jpg

Dmitry Medvedev signed Executive Order awarding the Order for Services to the Fatherland, IV degree to Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations.

Mr Churkin was awarded the decoration for his great contribution to protecting and promoting Russia’s interests on the international stage.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 25/02/2012 @ 08:17
Russia has renewed tests of a flying submarine which have been interrupted by the order of president Michael Gorbachev 26 years ago. The submarine-invisible being, which capable to come up from water and instantly to change speed and a flight trajectory, was developed by the Soviet designers during 30 years and this submarine has shown excellent results during tactical tests near coast of Sweden and Norway.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 26/02/2012 @ 18:03
Despicable is Hillary Clinton
                                                   
                                                
26.02.2012

Hillary Clinton is an interesting case study. She started four years ago as a charming Secretary of State, the smile on the snout to wipe out the snarl of her predecessor, Condoleezza Rice and four years on, she appears on camera butch, a trucker-type probably complete with tattoos, insolent, inconsequential and incompetent. We now understand Bill.

What happened to Hillary Clinton?

Her credentials for the position of Secretary of State were never that great; let us be honest: someone who lied on camera for all to see about getting off an aircraft in the middle of a war zone in Bosnia in the 1990s when in fact she arrived to a red-carpet welcome, complete with band playing... Since when is a red carpet and a band a war zone?

Right...

And now, the Chief of Diplomacy of the United States of America imitates her representative at the UNO, Susan Rice, in insolence, calling Russia and China "despicable" for spoiling her war plans in Syria (and beyond).

Insolence is indeed the mainstay and the keyword behind US diplomacy, intrusion ditto and hypocrisy has to be the toothpick in the throat of those who try to expound Washington's virtue on the world stage. And let us be perfectly frank. Hillary Rodham Clinton had a very easy passage before her as the outwardly visible sidekick of Barack Obama, elected after eight years of a Bush regime which confirmed all the worst nightmares of the conspiracy theorists. Did she pull it off? No she didn't.

For someone in her position, to label the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China as "despicable" because they exercised their right to block NATO's evil desire to make another Libya out of Syria, is a clear sign of how low US diplomacy has sunk. In fact, it is difficult to discern which of the last three Secretaries of State is worse: Colin Powell, with his lies at the UNO about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction; Condoleezza Rice, with her justification of Georgia's murderous attack against Russians and now Hillary War Zone Clinton, responsible for Libya and desperate to press further eastwards as she holds the hands of those whose human rights records are...in a word...despicable.

Despicable are those Gulf Royals, unelected, but in power, and accepted without a word of contestation by Clinton and Obama and company, some of whom allegedly go to Morocco and perform the most horrific sexual crimes with boys and girls...despicable are the leaders of the Gulf States favourable to the USA and its allies siphoning off their resources, which have carried out the most draconian measures against their citizens.

No mention from despicable Hillary War Zone Clinton.

Despicable is the United States of America and its policy of torture flights, on which CIA operationals carried out barbaric acts against detainees; despicable it is to flout international law, invade sovereign states and destroy their civilian infrastructures with military hardware.

Despicable it is to maintain concentration camps, a festering wound on the collective face of humanity and a profound insult to human decency. Despicable it is to sodomise detainees; despicable it is to urinate in food, despicable it is to deprive detainees of sleep, despicable it is to water-board people, despicable it is to force Moslems to eat pork.

Despicable is Guantanamo Bay concentration camp, where the worst human rights violations in Latin America are perpetrated by the United States of America; despicable was Abu Ghraib concentration camp in Iraq, where the great American heroine Lynndie England was let loose on people who had been imprisoned without charge but hey! "just havin' fun". Despicable it is to detain people without due process, without access to a lawyer, without access to family visits and without even an accusation.

Despicable it is to arm terrorists overseas, as was the case in Libya and as is the case in Syria. Despicable, then, if we analyse with a modicum of intelligence, is Hillary R. Clinton and the hellhole that she represents.

To prove my point, in how many of the human rights violations mentioned above were Russia and China involved?

None.

Thank you. I rest my case. Hillary War Zone Liar Clinton: YOU are despicable.


   
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 28/02/2012 @ 10:51
Qatar emir has ordered to kill Vladimir Putin
   
   
   
Chechen terrorists planned Putin's assassination after election
   
   
   
27.02.2012
   
   
The story with the attempted assassination of Russian Prime Minister and presidential hopeful Vladimir Putin, which became the talk of the day in the media today, could be interpreted as an attempt to destabilize the situation in the country.   
   
Konstantin Simonov, the General Director of the Fund of the National Energy Security, believes that this could be possible indeed. "Russia is a large and important player. Other players could be interested in destabilizing the country. I would like to believe that this information about the plan of the terrorist attack against Putin in Odessa (Ukraine) is not going to lead to any repressive mechanisms inside the country. From this point of view, it is a positive factor that the attack was plotted on the territory of another country," Simonov told Pravda.Ru.   
   
In the meantime, Viktor Ozerov, the chairman of the defense and security committee of the Federation Council, believes that the plot to assassinate Putin was an attempt to take revenge on the prime minister for his successive work in the struggle against terrorism, Arguments and Facts newspaper said.   
   
"Putin's whole activities, from his work in the Federal Security Bureau till his current position, was targeted to struggle against organized criminal groups and terrorism," Ozerov said.   
   
First Channel reported today that Ukrainian and Russian special services detained a group of criminals in the city of Odessa, Ukraine. The criminals were on international wanted list. It became clear from their testimony that they planned Putin's assassination soon after the presidential election in Russia.   
   
One of the detainees, Ilya Pyanzin, said that he and his associate arrived in Ukraine from the United Arab Emirates, via Turkey. They also said that they had received the instructions for the terrorist act from Doku Umarov, one of the leaders of Chechen separatists. According to Pyanzin, they were supposed to conduct subversive activities at a number of economic objects in Moscow. Afterwards, they were supposed to assassinate Putin.   
   
A similar story took place on the day of the presidential vote in Russia on March 2, 2008. A Tajik national wielding a sniper rifle was detained near the Kremlin. The man was supposedly planning the assassination of Putin and Medvedev during a concert on Red Square. This information was later rebutted, though.   
   
Chechen terrorists also planned Putin's assassination in August 2000 in Ukraine, during the summit of the CIS in Yalta. Security services foiled the plot as well.

Let's remind that the Chechen terrorists receive money and orders through a chain of figureheads from Qatar throughout many years. The Qatar emir receives video reports from the Chechen terrorists and coordinates their further actions.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 02/03/2012 @ 11:13
Dixit :
Despicable is Hillary Clinton

                                                                              
                                                                              
26.02.2012   

Hillary Clinton is an interesting case study. She started four years ago as a charming Secretary of State, the smile on the snout to wipe out the snarl of her predecessor, Condoleezza Rice and four years on, she appears on camera butch, a trucker-type probably complete with tattoos, insolent, inconsequential and incompetent. We now understand Bill.   
      


Head-in-the-sand Washington Post defends Trucker-type Clinton
                                                      
                                                   
01.03.2012

   

So, the Washington Post has come out. Draped among its rainbow colors are posters of Hillary "War Zone" Clinton, complete with new "butch-style trucker" look, a foul snarl on a foul mouth which vomits insolence, arrogance and overbearance. Wow. It took them three whole days to come up with a disappointing hastily-written pile of drivel.
   
It took the Washington Post and author Al Kamen three whole days to write part of a column on my article "Despicable is Hillary Clinton", published last Sunday in Pravda.Ru's English version, dubbed "over-the-top" in the piece "Pravda sticks it to 'trucker-type' Clinton" in the section In The Loop, published on February 29. If this is the best the Washington Post can do, maybe it is better they stick to the policy of February 29 pieces so we only have to deal with them once every four years.
   
One knows educational standards in the USA are falling, as we can see only too clearly by reading what people write, where the spelling and grammar are so basically flawed that one can only suppose the speech over the pond is reduced to belching or grunting monosyllables. How they can come out of school after twelve years and not know the difference between "its" and "it's", or "there" and "their", defies logic but what to expect from a country whose Washington Post, once a flagship publication, states that Pravda "formerly a commie house organ and now apparently in that same mode"?

The author, and his editors, have clearly not even bothered to research where Pravda.Ru is positioned and what has happened inside Russia since 1991, which figures, from a country where a Secretary of State can claim loud and clear that she stepped off an airplane in Bosnia in the middle of a war zone, when in fact the "guns" were trumpets, the "grenades" were cymbals and the "trench" was a pristine clean neatly rolled-out red carpet.
   
The author then goes on to call the rest of my op-ed piece "incoherent" but fails to explain why, when his own piece falls apart spectacularly, and for me, shockingly, after paragraph five. One can only imagine the piece was written hurriedly before publication or else perhaps after lunch?
   
While the Washington Post piece tries to justify Washington-proper's animosity towards and demonology against Syria, claiming that the Armed Forces bombard women and children indiscriminately, it makes a series of mistakes.
   
Firstly, it claims that Gaddafi was not shelling women and children indiscriminately...so where was the Washington Post when the FUKUS Axis (France, UK, US and Israel) was strafing civilians in Libya with military hardware to "protect" them from the Libyan Armed Forces? Where was the Washington Post when the western media was rife with stories about massacres by the Libyan Armed Forces against civilians, where was the Washington Post when the western media outlets trained their cameras (with permission from the Libyan Government) on screaming kids in hospitals, before lying, that is, that they had been attacked by Libyan Armed Forces and not by the FUKUS Axis' warplanes (cowards dropping bombs on water supplies and electricity grids from 30,000 feet "to break their backs") and the terrorists they unleashed? These lies by the western media against Colonel Gaddafi were exposed in this column time and time again yet they continued to be printed and shown on TV and espoused by War Zone Clinton.

Now secondly, fast-forward to Syria, where the same accusations are being reiterated. It is patently clear that the Washington Post and its trucker-type friend deserve zero credibility; the paper has lost all of its prestige and has become a worthless rag of the most putrid and unpleasant kind, which I for one would not use were it the only pile of paper lying beside my toilet bowl. Claiming that the Syrian Armed Forces are indiscriminately attacking women and children would be the same as claiming that the man occupying the White House was a serial paedophile (*), yet that is what the Washington Post claims.
   
How to respond to claptrap like that? Unfounded and wrong accusations it is easy to put to paper, what is more amazing is that a newspaper which claims to be respectable actually prints it. The Syrian Armed Forces are fighting against terrorists, armed and aided by external forces.
   
The solution in Syria and to the Syrian question is crystal clear and is hardly rocket science: stop arming terrorists and the Government will stop fighting them. However, Hillary "War Zone" Clinton has gone the way of her predecessors, namely instead of honouring the flag she represents, consigns it to a sodden rag not even fit to clean the sodomised posteriors of the victims of illegal detention by US "just havin' fun" personnel.
   
Instead of forging friendly relationships with the world community, instead of using Obama's reset button, what does Despicable Hillary "War Zone" Clinton do? She cavorts with the FUKUS Axis, arming terrorists and racists and rapists and sexists in Libya, groups which she purports to abhor, does the same in Syria and then derides with insolence those who stand up for international law after she and her friends have broken it.
   
Russia was ready for a reset. It is obvious that Washington, once again, cannot be trusted. In fact, trusting Washington as a bed-partner is the same thing as sleeping with an AIDS-ridden syphilitic stinking whore with zero morals and expecting to climb out of bed with your health or wallet intact.
   
If the Clinton camp was furious with my piece, then suppose Despicable War Zone Hillary started showing some respect first if she wants any back, suppose she remembered that when you call others "despicable" the chickens can come home to roost and that if she can't take the heat, then get out of the kitchen.
   
Actually, I apologise. To AIDS-ridden syphilitic stinking whores.
   
(*) Let it be clear this is not an accusation, it is an analogy. War criminal, yes; paedophile, not as far as we know.
   
   
   
      
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 03/03/2012 @ 19:19

Lies on SKY: From terrorist to activist
   
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
03.03.2012
   

What is the difference between a "terrorist" and an "activist"? It is easy to say. A "terrorist" is an activist who does not buy weapons from western sources. An "activist" is a terrorist who does. Lies on SKY. After Libya, Syria and after Syria, Russia. The ball has started rolling, the dice have been thrown. Read on...
   
SKY News and its friends in the "bought" squeaky clean international press package are a sinister, disgusting and dangerous gaggle of traders of lies and fabrications while claiming to be serious and to represent the truth. Just who the Hell do they think they are kidding? After lies on Libya, more lies on Syria and now, even more lies on Russia.
   
One thing is presenting news with a very heavy slant, using biased reporting, paid hacks and an implacable machine to brainwash a people. Another is an objective and independent media willing to hear all sides and presenting a balanced, objective argument.
   
Until this point, I believe we all agree. Where we start to disagree is where the seams of righteousness based upon Cold War lies start to fall apart, where we start to disagree is where age-old precepts of what is right and wrong, what is good and evil, start to fade away and lose their integrity. We live in a changing world where the globalisation of values is a fact, where the loss of principles and what we used to call common decency is a permanent player and what we are told today, is not necessarily how it is.

Let us take for example SKY News. Flashback: Iraq war (illegal interference and murderous invasion of a sovereign state outside the auspices of the UNSC). SKY News Jeremy Thompson crawling up the legs of US troops "Hey you guys! You looking for some revenge for 9/11 [sic]?"
   
The image was created: Iraq was responsible for 9/11, therefore the invasion was justified. What? Iraq wasn't involved? No, in fact. It was probably the last country to be involved with Al-Qaeda given the hatred between Saddam Hussein (formerly supported by the CIA) and Al-Qaeda (formerly supported by the CIA as the Afghan Mujaheddin).
   
Libya: SKY News reported that Libyan government aircraft had strafed civilian homes. Fact. Saif al-Islam al-Qathafi asked SKY News to show him the homes strafed by the Libyan Air Force. Guess what happened? They couldn't find any. Virtually none of the western media outlets stated what Muammar al-Qathafi had done for his country and for Africa and that he was to receive a humanitarian prize from the UNO, just as today they refuse to report on the mayhem unfolding inside Libya after the FUKUS-Axis terrorist invasion (France, UK, US and Israel plus Qatar in this case).
   
So, we start to see SKY for what SKY is. Live on SKY is more often than not, Lies on SKY. In Syria, "terrorists" are now "activists". What is the difference between a "terrorist" and an "activist"? It is easy to say. A "terrorist" is an activist who does not buy weapons from western sources. An "activist" is a terrorist who does.

And in Russia? In Russia, we have a SKY News correspondent running around, filming and quoting as "sources" anonymous people off-camera, who are claiming that the Russian elections are rigged. So how credible is an anonymous faceless source who asks not to be identified or filmed? As credible as saying "Breaking News! I heard someone said that she heard a lady in the bakery claiming her hairdresser had told her one of her clients' second cousin's half-sister's lesbian girlfriend had said that she'd read somewhere that somebody heard on some radio programme that David Cameron fell off a horse and banged his head and that was when he started dating girls".
   
Making libellous claims about rigged elections is the prerogative of any Russian citizen. Interfering in a foreign country, going around finding "anonymous" sources and quoting their lies as fact is downright scandalous and is a true indicator of where the heart and mind of SKY News lies - in lies, in insolence and in intrusion.
   
SKY News belongs to the cesspit of gutter journalism and their headline on Monday will be some nonsense about Putin winning a rigged election. Translation: SKY News in particular and the western media in general have as much grasp of the reality in Russia as they have of life on Jupiter. Plus it is obvious what they are trying to do: take away the Russian President's legitimacy to weaken him. Well, ladies and gentlemen, that is NOT going to happen. Putin is the right man in the right place at the right time.
   
Vladimir Putin does not need to rig an election to win in a country where he is respected and loved, where two in every three people, at the very least, if not four in every five, see him as a respectable leader who represents the interests of his country, who stands up for Russia and her traditions and culture, who places Russia on the centre stage of world affairs and who represents an intelligent and balanced domestic and foreign policy based upon the rule of law, based upon the fundamental precepts of democracy which are debate and discussion and dialogue.
   
What part of that does SKY News and its western media pigs not get?
   
      
      
         
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 07/03/2012 @ 09:31
up_immagini/sana007.jpg

The Russian Orthodox Church position, personal position of Most-holy Kirill, Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia, has crucial importance for a position of Russia in the NATO - Syrians conflict. Protection of Orthodox Relics and protection of coreligionists are the main interest of Russia in Syria. Russia has no other preferences and interests for protection of Syria against NATO aggression.

up_immagini/sana006.jpg    
   
Russia arms Cyprus. Russia renders the secret both obvious military and financial help to other orthodox countries. Turkey should be careful of the direct conflict to Russia and military intervention into Syria. Turkish intrusion in the Syrian conflict is a fine and long-awaited pretext for annexation of a part of Turkish territories for revival of Orthodox theocratic empire.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 08/03/2012 @ 20:41
Stocks of minerals aren't concentrated only in Russia. Minerals are evenly distributed on all Euro-Asian continent. Oil including. The largest oil field which is comparable with a field in Iraq on oil stocks, is arranged in the center of Europe - in France. Why Frenchmen plunder Libya, Iraq, buy the Iranian oil, but don't extract the French oil?

 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 09/03/2012 @ 09:32
Iran navy in Atlantic Ocean
               
   
Iran: Capable of increasing military presence in Atlantic ocean
   
   
            
08.03.2012
   
   

   
Iranian Army Commander, Major General Ataollah Salehi, said Monday that Iran's Navy has the ability to extend its presence to the Atlantic Ocean.   

"Today the Iranian Navy has the ability to expand its presence to the Atlantic Ocean beyond the Gulf of Aden, the Mediterranean Sea, the Suez Canal, north of the Indian Ocean and Red Sea," Salehi said.   

"This shows the power of Iran and the complete preparation of the Iranian navy," he added.   

Citing the recent maneuvers of the navy, "Velayat 90," on December 24 last year, the Iranian commander said the move was very important and demonstrated the power and security of the Islamic Republic of Iran.   
The maneuvers have used different classes of submarines, including Tareq and Qadir, and the newer system of land-sea and torpedoes.   

In recent years, Iran has made significant progress in the defense sector, and has achieved self-sufficiency in the production of military equipment and systems.   

The Islamic Republic has explained repeatedly that military power is based on the doctrine of national defense and poses no threat to other countries
   
Translated from the Spanish version by:
   
         
Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 12/03/2012 @ 14:23
Barack Obama's administration prepares public opinion for war with Russia


The data arriving from Headquarters of the NATO in Brussels, confirm the information which has arrived from Washington, on preparation of military intrusion into Syria and the probable military conflict to Russia and Iran. Administration of the American president has started to prepare public opinion for the big dragged-out war of universal scale.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 13/03/2012 @ 09:36
Clinton and Hague: Dynamic Duo of Deplorable Diplomats
                                                      
                                                   
13.03.2012
   
What is the difference between Sergei Lavrov, Hillary Clinton and William (Jefferson) Hague? One of them is a Diplomat, the other two are a very poor duo of English-speaking wannabes who insult the international community with every word that comes out of their mouths and who betray their countries with each and every act.
   
Hague's claim made today (Monday) that there have been diplomatic consequences for "Russia and China" over the decision to veto the more intrusive impulses of the FUKUS-Axis (France, UK, US and Israel) is a telling example of his arrogance, insolence and top-down, know-it-all, break-wind-in-your-face approach to diplomacy, not his middle name. For a start, get the countries right. It is the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China.
   
Secondly, what "diplomatic consequences"? There have been diplomatic consequences for the FUKUS-Axis for sure, after their lies on Libya and their wholesale act of slaughter, arming and financing terrorists and sending them into Libyan society to do what they did. And now the diplomatic consequences for the United Kingdom and the United States of America are that their governments sided with those who sliced the breasts off women in the streets, who sliced the throats of negroes because they were black, who committed ethnic cleansing, who raped children, who tortured people (an American speciality), sodomised detainees, torched buildings, went looting and stealing. They copy the US Armed Forces pretty well, in fact.

The diplomatic consequences for the United Kingdom and the United States of America are that these two countries allowed their armed forces to purposefully target a building where the Gaddafi grandchildren were massacred, allowed their armed forces to choose civilian targets with military hardware, used their armed forces to destroy the water supply network and the electricity grid "to break their backs". One supposes Hillary War Zone Clinton and her nasty British sidekick are proud of that...
   
The diplomatic consequences for the United Kingdom and the United States of America are, after their spectacular "mission creep" in Libya, where the book stated that they would police a no-fly zone and in fact the operation turned into a full-scale invasion complete with the FUKUS-Axis' terrorists and special forces with boots on the ground, that the word of London and Washington has as much weight, or less, as that of a desperate heroin addict in anextreme phase of withdrawal.
   
In fact, the integrity of the dodgy-looking fellow hissing in the darkness peddling the proverbial second-hand Romanian wristwatch is greater that what Hague and Clinton have made their countries represent.
   
They are liars and their forces have committed war crimes and arguably, crimes against humanity. The UK and USA as part of the FUKUS-Axis have broken international law, they have broken the terms of the Geneva Conventions. The foreign policies of these two pariahs in the world community, these rogue states, are regarded with hatred and derision by the vast majority of humankind.

Regarding Syria, due to the recent history of these two countries, and due to the pathetic performance of these two abject failures at the highest level of diplomatic representation of their countries, what authority to Washington and London have to opine on Syria? They wanted another war, they didn't get one. And due to their lies on Libya, they aren't getting one, precisely because one cannot believe a word they say.
   
Now they are presenting "evidence" of "massacres", such as the one in Homs, accusing one side and without bearing in mind the fact that slitting the throats of women and children is the sort of activity their friends got up to in Libya, and was far more likely the result of the actions of the terrorists they are supporting in Syria than the Syrian Armed Forces.
   
Let us be honest: Libya was about oil. Syria is about oil, it is about depriving the Russian Federation of her Mediterranean naval base, it is about placing the final stepping stone for the attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran, it is about disbanding HAMAS and Hezbollah and allowing Israel to steal more land and build more colonies, it is about turning a blind eye on Israel's nuclear bombs, it is about then expanding northwards into Central Asia today and Siberia tomorrow, then encircling the PR China.
   
So who the Hell do Hague and Clinton think they are fooling? Suppose they went home, took their troops with them, and minded their own business for a change? We, the members of the world community, did not elect Clinton or Hague or Obama or Cameron. Therefore, suppose they practised their authority over those who elected them?
   
NATO, go home!
   
   
      
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 17/03/2012 @ 00:22
The Belgian children who were lost in accident, the Libyan children killed by pilots of the Belgian Air Forces, the Syrian children killed by NATO mercenaries, the Serbian children dismembered by the Italian and Albanian doctors, the Afghani children who have been torn to pieces by the American soldiers, all children who were lost because of adults, are huge loss and a reproach for each person of mother Earth.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 17/03/2012 @ 22:17
The prophecy for France is deciphered and says that the strong-willed woman-president will deduce the country of Gauls from crises and will return advantage to the country. The false leader will lose the tongue and will be driven out.
 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 26/03/2012 @ 20:54
Israel has no possibility for use of its nuclear potential. The Israeli ballistic missiles and rocket-planes will be destroyed at once on take-off with huge consequences for environment.

Daily spaceport "Molebka" accepts not less than three spacecraft patrolling air space of Syria, Iran and Israel.

 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 27/03/2012 @ 16:07
Mitt Romney: "Russia is our number one geopolitical foe"



27.03.2012

Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts governor and a possible head of the White House, called Russia the main geopolitical main enemy of the United States. He made the statement during his appearance on CNN.

"Russia, this is, without question, our number one geopolitical foe. They - they fight every cause for the world's worst actors," he   said, commenting on the outcome of the meeting of the US and Russian presidents in Seoul.

During a conversation about missile defense, Obama told his Russian counterpart Dmitri Medvedev that he'd have more "flexibility" after the election.

Romney said he was "very concerned" about the president's remarks, especially because they were made to a Russian leader.

"Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage and for this president to be looking for greater flexibility where he doesn't have to answer to the American people in his relations with Russia is very, very troubling, very alarming," he said. "I am very, very concerned.

"This is to Russia," Romney said. "This is without question our number one geopolitical foe.

"Russia - Unfriendly figure on the world stage. Fact that the president is seeking greater flexibility in relations with Russia despite the fact that he had nothing to say to the American people about the relationship with Russia - a very disturbing sign. I am very, very concerned about this. It - Russia is, without question, our geopolitical enemy number one "- said Romney.

Romney takes the lead on the number of delegates, who in a few months will vote for him at the Republican Convention, which would formally define a rival to Barack Obama at the presidential election in November.


 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 29/03/2012 @ 10:51
Mitt Romney: Out-of-touch, out-of-date, unelectable
                                                      
                                                   
28.03.2012


Electing Mitt Romney as the next President of the United States of America would be like appointing a serial paedophile as a kindergarten teacher, a rapist as a janitor at a girls' dormitory or a psychopath with a fixation on knives as a kitchen hand. His comments on Russia are a puerile attempt at making the grand stage and boy, did he blow it...

Somewhat like Condoleezza Rice did before the Bush regime was er..."elected" ..., Mitt Romney takes the chance to mouth off about Russia, calling her "our number one geopolitical foe" which fights "every cause for the world's worst actors". Unfortunately, such vapid stupidity has become commonplace among senior US politicians, providing the rest of the world with a telling insight as to the real nature of the political class in that country - out of touch, out of date and dangerously jingoistic. In short, overgrown self-opinionated schoolboys with super-egos but nothing whatsoever to back it up with.

True, it feels great to slag off another country's cuisine and say, for example, that "Mexican food is crap! American food is far better!" Adolescent-type comments such as these generally provoke a session of back-patting, and a ra-ra-ra raucous explosion of national pride which after a few drinks degenerates into "My God is better than your God" and then "My President could smack the crap out of yours".

Fine for grade school playgrounds. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is where this upstart nonentity Mitt Romney belongs, certainly not to the intricate and complex wheels and cogs of world policy and nowhere near a red button. Imagine this guy as President!

Exactly at a time when Russia and the USA are finding that they have far more in common than differences, exactly when they see that they are much more friends than foes, when they see that there is so much to be gained through collaboration, a foul-mouthed, big-headed oaf like Romney with more money than sense makes a comment that reveals who he really is to the world: a pea-brained, pith-headed simpleton with too much testosterone and too little common sense, with zero tact, no diplomacy and a paramount grasp on the intricacies of world politics. A prize, good-for-nothing ignoramus

At a time when Russia and the United States of America are working together in space, at a time when the scientific communities and Universities are ever more intricately linked, when the security networks share information more freely on terrorists, on crime, combating drugs trafficking, at a time when the two countries are working together on trade and commerce and forging common links on intellectual property rights, up comes stick-in-the-mud wannabe Presidential candidate Mitt Romney blurting out outdated Cold War drivel like some redneck nearing an alcoholic coma.

With as much credibility. In fact, one has seen more intelligent things scrawled in excrement on the walls of public latrines.

So nobody needs to remind Mitt Romney, now we are speaking about geopolitical foes, which nation carried out an act of atomic terrorism, not once but twice, slaughtering hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians with a callous and cold-blooded disregard for the lives of women and children; we do not need to remind Mitt Romney, now we are speaking about geopolitical foes, who deployed agent orange in Nam and committed massacres and mass rape there.

And now we are speaking about geopolitical foes, we do not need to remind Mitt Romney about who was supporting terrorists in Afghanistan to undermine the only progressive government the country has had, terrorists which morphed into the Taliban, we do not need to remind Mitt Romney about the outrageous act of slaughter in Iraq, about the illegal detention of civilians and the shocking and barbaric treatment meted out to them by the likes of his probable heroine Lynndie England, we do not need to remind Mitt Romney about concentration camps and human rights abuses managed and masterminded by personnel from the good old US of A.

So perhaps Mitt Romney agrees with US policy? Maybe he agrees with Guantanamo Bay concentration camp, maybe he applauded what went on in Abu Ghraib - the urinating in food, the torture, the setting dogs on people, the rape, the sodomy of male detainees. Aren't Mormons supposed to be against these things? Wow... Mitt Romney probably backed the USA's policy of arming and supporting terrorists in Libya to destroy the Jamahiriya just because Gaddafi's African projects were costing its institutions and lobbies too much money and for sure Mitt Romney is also backing the terrorists, (sorry "activists" because they buy NATO weaponry) in Syria.

So talking about geopolitical foes...next time Mitt Romney had better back off, butt out and mind his manners, so as not to appear like a foul-mouthed guttersnipe whose utter ignorance and pig-headed arrogance is only too clear for all to see. See how he walked straight into this one, ladies and gentlemen? Imagine THAT as your President...
   
      
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, Pravda.Ru

 
Admin
Aдмин
Просмотров: 2653
Тем: 89
Сообщений: 2001

Offline
создано: 30/03/2012 @ 10:35





Iran will protect Syria
                     
                     
30.03.2012
   
   
"Iran strongly rejects any U.S. plan in respect of Syria"


The Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, announced on Thursday that his country outrightly rejects any U.S. plan on Syria.

During a meeting held with the Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and his accompanying delegation, in the city of Mashhad (on northeastern Iranian territory), the supreme leader said Iran will defend Syria because the Arab country supports the line of Resistance to the Israeli regime, saying that Tehran strongly rejects any foreign intervention in the internal affairs of Syria.

According to Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran will continue to support reforms in Syria and declared that the reform process started in this country must take its course.

Iran's Supreme Leader stressed the need to deepen cooperation between Iran and Turkey and said that whenever the two countries jointly have supported something in various fields, they have benefited themselves and the Islamic world.

The Supreme Leader referred to the immense capacity to develop partnerships, especially in the oil and gas sector, and noted that Iran is considered a rich country, worldwide, for its extensive oil and gas resources.

He also addressed the sensitive conditions of the region and emphasized that, thank God, the events in the area have been in favor of Islam and Muslims, and will remain this way.

"In this circumstance, the most important issue is that independent countries make right decisions," he added.

Ayatollah Khamenei, referring to the instrumental use of the countries of the region by the world powers, especially the U.S., said that Americans do not accept the independence of any people, and have this attitude with all countries, therefore it is necessary to bear in mind the benefits of Islamic nations when making decisions.

On the other hand, he referred to the political power of the trends towards Islam in Turkey, and said that these conditions are not pleasant in any way to the West, especially U.S., and while they are upset by this situation, the Islamic Republic of Iran is satisfied with the presence of their Muslim brothers in the power elite of Turkey.

Translated from the Spanish version by:

Lisa Karpova, Pravda.Ru
 
СтартНазад [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] ДалееКонец


@Mail.ru - counter Яндекс цитирования Рейтинг пермских сайтов

free counters